This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultAsking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The Suns pg3 topless glamour models

Why would there be a topless woman in the local newspaper. Pg3? Seems a bit awkward dads at the breakfast table ooogling tits. I know they dont do the pg3 topless models anymore but just seems so strange they ever did.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
AuRevoir · 36-40, M
What’s strange about it?

To me it’s funny how women’s breast can be bared in art throughout the world. Revered as wholesome and an essence of the life they’ve given throughout all the ages.

But in even worse scenarios such as strip clubs, porn, only fans and it’s seen as women’s empowerment.. where they perform some of the worst things…

But a model who just happens to be topless is too much for society and strange despite all the far worse things in life…

Humans contradict themselves and complain about small things… While being fine with far more abhorrent ones.

Breasts are fairly tame by todays standards. It makes no sense to me that it should be villainized… Especially when there’s nude beaches etc…
DarkSideoftheMoon · 36-40, F
@AuRevoir i think its because intent and context. A womens body is beautiful its art but its uncomfortable when its presented in a way to arouse ur dad at breakfast i completely see your point but its just... weird when its in a newspaper being presented in a way, meant to arouse. Idk how else to explain it.
AuRevoir · 36-40, M
@DarkSideoftheMoon To me it’s like… Despite all the massive amount of health flaws with caffeine the majority of society wakes up with breakfast to caffeine… And it’s a stimulant… A topless woman is also a stimulant.. Papers are simply more what’s it called… out in the open.. Getting rid of the paper doesn’t solve anything nor does complaining about it… Even if the paper weren’t around people have cell phones.. and often do it that.. paper just comes across more classy really… As the paper controls the content being seen. And they’re keeping it topless…

It’s funny to me how the paper is the issue and not the content… As the same people have had the paper removed and then simply start their mornings with looking through far worse stuff not distributed by a paper.. But people not being able to see what’s happening on their phone as they’d have to become really invasive to do so, suddenly reach a take on the situation of ignorance being bliss even though far worse is occurring… 🤷‍♀️ I see that as a loss… It’s like taking away weed off all the streets and people complaining about it but leaving heroin and crack utterly available.. To me it’s stupid.. As one situation is obviously worse than the other..

Though my preference would be to get rid of it all.. no one would be in favor of that, so objectively speaking I’d side with the lesser exposure of the two..
DarkSideoftheMoon · 36-40, F
@AuRevoir the content is way worse but didnt know because never read the paper. Just found this out yesterday.

Its just tastless in my opinion. Like if it was ur wife looking at cock at breakfast with ur kids there, kind of trashy. Inappropriate.