If anything what I am saying is anti-sexism. I don't think that it is gay for a guy to wear shorts that show a little more of his legs. To me long shorts are uncomfortable and I don't see anything wrong with guys wearing what is comfortable. He doesn't have to be showing off.

Some men's shorts are ridiculously long. They look so uncomfortable, how do they walk in them.

I think it's okay above the knee. My Dad wears a pair of tennis shorts that he's had since the 1980's. They look fine to me.

@girls, definitely nothing wrong with showing upper legs. That's what I wear sometimes.
But showing butt cheeks is too gay for me. That is for girls, not recommended for men's attire

I don't see anything wrong with it either. It's kind of sexist to only view women as objects on display, isn't it ? Let's ogle the men, too ! 😀

Obviously, everyone wants to see my thighs.

Newfrommars, we don't have to wear short shorts, some of us just like them better and they are more comfortable.

It doesn't really make a difference to me. As long as there's no indecent exposure, it shouldn't matter.

I agree. Only young punks wear long shorts. Or men with ugly legs.

My shorts are all above the knee and I'm heterosexual

as short as rugby shorts...ooooooh I like

It's fine by me :)

I don't see anything wrong with a man in shorts that show his thigh, but definitely not so short that other things show. I also don't think that shorter shorts make a guy look like he is gay.

Personally i play rugby so short are well above the knee and am not in the slightest bit gay also more men are getting muscular legs these days and shorter shorts show them off better

girlsmoke,, the wife is the last to know.. if he's looking at guys, and thinking they're gay.. that's where his mindset is..

@bijouxbroussard, Simply put, I just don't enjoy seeing men wearing butt-cheek showing shorts.

I think that a little longer than just not showing butt cheeks, but nothing wrong with upper leg showing.

I prefer shorts that come to mid thigh. I dislike the longer ones.

sounds like your hubby may have gay tendencies.

Shorter shorts are more comfortable too

I agree with your husband.

my son says the same thing .he wears his shorts below his knees,which mean that his underwear are show with out a very long shirt.nothing wrong with wear shorter shorts

I find about 5" midseam the most comfortable. Short enough to allow movement, but long enough to keep everything in.

My casual shorts are a couple inches above. Some of my running shorts are way higher but then my legs are a gift to the world

i have a long way from my knee to my butt.none of my shorts go below my knee but none let me hang out either.

Yes, shorts above the knee are a bit... Well, I wouldn't wear a pair that short

I think so long as they don't show butt cheeks, then its not short.

Guys who show their legs are so weird imo

My hubby is not the slightest bit gay.

Magic Johnson

That is an intelligent response. I wear minidresses or miniskirts that are long enough to cover my panty. Comfortable. Ease of movement. Better suntan.

Girl smoke: I agree with YOU.

He doesn't look at guys, I ask him the question and he answered me.

Why do girls have to wear shorts shorts?

@UnderTheBridge: you're saying girls and gay men are meant to be objects on display---not men. Right ? And that's how sexism still exists in 2016.

@KeasbeyNights: Hey, you ! I'm sure they do. Good to see you again. 😊