Once we move beyond the mere gossipy tabloid-esque inclusion of a person's name in a file and onto actual substantive evidence of a crime, then perhaps prosecution is more likely to follow?
How many times so far have you rest in one of the billions of daily articles about "the files" that someone just merely showed up in "the files" because some random person gave the FBI a "tip" but never provided any evidence to substantiate their claim, and thus the only reason a given person is even in "the files" is because two FBI agents emailed each other to discuss the random person providing a useless tip?
Now, the mere fact that the person is in "the files' through the situation described above, that random fact is in turn being use by the general public as some sort of evidence of a crime, which just goes to show you how daft people can be.
Child abuse didn't begin with Epstein and Maxwell, why does the general public just suddenly care now? Is it just because they find it a more entertaining story now because it titillates their inner conspiracy theorist, while they'll soon move on, and could care less about any instances of less headline-generating child abuse happening every day without any so-called "elites" involved?
