This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ArishMell · 70-79, M
Yes but not by slipper or cane, only by hand. Over-knee, in class in Infants' School, and so out of character it stuck in my mind and probably seeded the penchant that began to surface only about 4 years later, when I was 10.
I have the seen a boy have the slipper, in PE class (where else?) in my mid-1960s state grammar school- but only one whack and on shorts.
I have the seen a boy have the slipper, in PE class (where else?) in my mid-1960s state grammar school- but only one whack and on shorts.
chikki · 70-79, M
@ArishMell it is far more traumatic if its two whacks and you see the big red shoe shaped marks on his bottom where he had been hit after having to take it on his bare bum. The sight of a boy getting his bare bum slippered often made more of an impact on those watching than actually getting it on their bum.
Caned4doz · 61-69, M
@ArishMell You're right; I don't think the teachers intended any arousal, but I'm quite sure they intended impact in two ways:
1. The obvious impact on the bottom of the boy being punished, and
2. The psychological impact on the other boys watching.
The second intention would have been to send a message to others to "watch out; you can be next".
1. The obvious impact on the bottom of the boy being punished, and
2. The psychological impact on the other boys watching.
The second intention would have been to send a message to others to "watch out; you can be next".