Hey, you all. If you are vaxxers, Anti Vaxxers, whatever, whosoever you are. If you are replying to this post, then you are the Resistance.

You don't know the logic behind the education you have received. You are conditioned not to question anything in the name of science. Earlier on, A Renaissance was needed to break these shackles of non questioning through science. Now the same science is being used not to question the Authority. To all of you, All of you consider yourself scientists, that is good. But you know the truth. The truth is you are not one. And all the crippled data can be manufactured, created like the data of China of only 5000ish death is created, manufactured.

So Grow up because tomorrow, one of you is going to be Kyle Reese and you will have to earn the Badge. Get out of this false illusion, open your mind. Ask questions. Even if you are right, you are wrong, that doesn't matter.

Stay warm
Stay safe
Where ever you are.

This is Col John Connor.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ElwoodBlues · M

Is this your way of telling us you don't understand how science works???

I read some of the key scientific publications about the vaccine tests. I sanity checked the statistics. I also sanity checked the anti-vaxxer claims. I questioned it all, dude.

[quote] And all the crippled data can be manufactured[/quote] There's a world of data and evidence out there. Making excuses for ignoring the data is totally unscientific.

[sep][sep][sep]

“If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science.”
— Richard P. Feynman

“When someone says 'science teaches such and such', he is using the word incorrectly. Science doesn't teach it; experience teaches it.”
— Richard P. Feynman

TheOrionbeltseeker · 36-40, M

@ElwoodBlues So you don't believe in data manipulation?

ElwoodBlues · M

@TheOrionbeltseeker Many things are conceivable. Where's your [i]evidence[/i] of this alleged data manipulation? What correlations and anti-correlations do you have? What kinds of outliers do you have??

BTW, notice we have already diverted from your initial claim? Notice how you're no longer arguing that "Now the same science is being used not to question the Authority"??

I'm happy to debate evidence for data manipulation, but let's also acknowledge that you've already ceded that you won't support your initial assertion.