Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Accept the Theory of Evolution

Genes code for proteins. That’s pretty much all they do (they have quite dull social lives, and don’t seem to have hobbies or outside interests). Those proteins are built up from amino acids.

The genes comprise large numbers of base-pairs, which are simply guanine matched with cytosine and adenine matched with thymine. The human genome contains around 3.2 billion of these base pairs (the largest we’ve found so far is that of the flowering plant Paris japonica, which has 150 billion base pairs. The marbled lungfish has 133 billion base pairs).

As I said, proteins are built up from amino acids. Each amino acid that is used to build the proteins is specified by three base-pairs (those blocks of three base-pairs are called codons).

Let’s look at cytochrome c (we could use any number of such proteins, but I have a fondness for cytochrome c… I like the alliteration)

The cytochrome c protein is built up from around 100 amino acids.
This means that there are 10E135 possible ways that the amino acids could be arranged… but not all of those arrangements would work, of course.
However, because there’s a high level of redundancy in the construction of cytosine c (and all proteins), a stunning 10E93 variants would still be functional.
So that’s 100,000,000,000, 000,000,000, 000,000,000, 000,000,000, 000,000,000, 000,000,000, 000,000,000, 000,000,000, 000,000,000, 000,000,000 possible ways that DNA could code for functional cytosine c.

Time to make some predictions in accordance with the Theory of Evolution, don’t you think?

1. Because evolution began from a tightly limited range of organisms, only one of those possible functional variants will have been passed down over the last 3.5 billion years.

2. Because of point mutations (among other factors), there should be evidence of extremely slight variation that has crept in over the last 3.5 billion years… after all, even high-fidelity copying systems aren’t perfect (and it would be suspicious if they appeared to be so)

3. That variation should be negligible for species that have comparatively recent common ancestors, and increase between species with more distant common ancestors… while still remaining negligible (The process is remarkably stable, so we wouldn’t expect too many of the 10E93 functional variants to have appeared).

So, what do we find?

How many amino acid differences are there between humans and other species?
To make things interesting, let’s list some species in order of how long it has been since we shared a common ancestor with each species, and then see how many amino acid differences there are between us and that species.
Chimpanzee = 0
Rhesus Monkey = 1
Rabbit = 9
Cow = 10
Pigeon = 12
Bullfrog = 20
Fruit Fly = 24
Wheat Germ = 37
Yeast = 42

Evidence-based simplicity and elegance… the Theory of Evolution
Abbenthewarwolf · 18-21, M
Good for you and your lack of real knowledge. I guess you wouldn't know that the wind existed if you didn't feel or see it's effect upon material objects you can see nor touch it yet it exist.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AbbenrainbowwolfAngel: Well, perhaps if make your point directly... simply say what you want to say... it'll be easier to understand you.
Abbenthewarwolf · 18-21, M
@newjaninev2: I did .just forget it okay. I'm sorry I botherd you
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AbbenrainbowwolfAngel: No need to apologise... you've done nothing wrong.

What is it that you wished to say?
Wraithorn · 51-55, M
Interesting...thanks for posting this for people to see and contemplate.
SW-User
Not certain if this expresses simplicity, it may express elegance.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@earthquakefish: I'm not sure what you mean... we're reflecting on love?
Could you clarify that a little for me, hun?
SW-User
I like your responses and ideas... but my time is nigh and I'm tired, so can we wait for me to clarify I don't find science clarifies love much?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@earthquakefish: Of course, no problem... we'll pick it up again whenever you like
Alabamiangoddess · 51-55, F
Are you saying Alabamians share DNA with wheat and pigeons?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Alabamiangoddess Yes, of course

all organisms share DNA with all other organisms, and wit every organism that has ever lived... that's an obvious, indeed unavoidable, consequence of evolution
Alabamiangods · 41-45, F
Why was my Alabamians don't burp and fart methane comment deleted?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Alabamiangods Check with your mummy before using the computer
FunReader55 · 51-55, M
Its also not a theory anymore right?
zork0000 · 56-60, M
@FunReader55 In science a theory is actually a proven idea that can be replicated, not something that is debatable.
FunReader55 · 51-55, M
@zork0000 Fair, I'll rephrase. The theoretical principle behind the Scientific Theory of Evolution has been proven.
Alabamiangoddess · 51-55, F
How do you explain the theory of evolution to me?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
zork0000 · 56-60, M
@Blackpower If you go far enough back ...
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment