PhoenixPhail · M
View 1 more replies »
RedBaron · M
@PathwayMachine Unless, of course, you’re always wrong. 🤷♂
PathwayMachine · M
@RedBaron think about it.
RedBaron · M
@PathwayMachine I did. That’s why I posted in the first place.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@BibleData I'm not confused, let me rephrase "Oh I see what you WERE trying to say"
It has nothing to do with God and biology - I don't understand, the OP layed out the common sense version of why animals have stripes contrasting it with the Bible's prenatal idea. I know you believe that the Bible didn't advocate the prenatal influence stuff , but it also doesn't explain any other cause and effect reason
Macroevolution cannot be observed becaused it happened in the past over vast amounts of times, but we can easily infer it from the data. That is the difference between faith and science, science requires data and proof, and faith does not. I'm sure Ken Ham and the like will try to say there is no evidence for macro evolution, or what scientists call natural selection, but he ignores the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Microevolution , I think you are refering to is the domestication of plants and animals. It always amazes me that people can understand the domestication of species but fail to understand how nature itself can affect a species evolution.
I disagree with your last statement. I would rather believe that there is a God that will bring me to heaven for eternity or that my love ones who passed away are in heaven. I would rather believe that there is a divine plan for everything, but in good conscience, I cannot. I'm not interested in what makes me feel good , but the truth that can be proven.
It has nothing to do with God and biology - I don't understand, the OP layed out the common sense version of why animals have stripes contrasting it with the Bible's prenatal idea. I know you believe that the Bible didn't advocate the prenatal influence stuff , but it also doesn't explain any other cause and effect reason
Macroevolution cannot be observed becaused it happened in the past over vast amounts of times, but we can easily infer it from the data. That is the difference between faith and science, science requires data and proof, and faith does not. I'm sure Ken Ham and the like will try to say there is no evidence for macro evolution, or what scientists call natural selection, but he ignores the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Microevolution , I think you are refering to is the domestication of plants and animals. It always amazes me that people can understand the domestication of species but fail to understand how nature itself can affect a species evolution.
I disagree with your last statement. I would rather believe that there is a God that will bring me to heaven for eternity or that my love ones who passed away are in heaven. I would rather believe that there is a divine plan for everything, but in good conscience, I cannot. I'm not interested in what makes me feel good , but the truth that can be proven.
