As a Christian/ creationist would you find it easier to accept evolution if it didn’t include humans
Then you can continue to believe god made you special.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DocSavage · M
@AkioTsukino
[quote] Then it is no longer science. Science is a method of investigation. Not a belief system. It examines truth, it doesn't decide it. There is no point in investigating what everyone already knows. Science doesn't display truth. It doesn't dictate it.
[/quote]
So now science is not a religion. It doesn’t do anything, just looks at what everyone already knows to be true.
And he says we’re idiots.
[quote] Then it is no longer science. Science is a method of investigation. Not a belief system. It examines truth, it doesn't decide it. There is no point in investigating what everyone already knows. Science doesn't display truth. It doesn't dictate it.
[/quote]
So now science is not a religion. It doesn’t do anything, just looks at what everyone already knows to be true.
And he says we’re idiots.
This message was deleted by its author.
DocSavage · M
@AkioTsukino
[quote] Then it is no longer science. Science is a method of investigation. Not a belief system. It examines truth, it doesn't decide it. There is no point in investigating what everyone already knows. Science doesn't display truth. It doesn't dictate it. [/quote]
Tell me Chuckles, can science be used to reveal truths , to separate lies from facts, myths from reality?
Or is it only used for identifying what has already been proven to be true ?
Seems to defeat the purpose doesn’t it ?
[quote] Then it is no longer science. Science is a method of investigation. Not a belief system. It examines truth, it doesn't decide it. There is no point in investigating what everyone already knows. Science doesn't display truth. It doesn't dictate it. [/quote]
Tell me Chuckles, can science be used to reveal truths , to separate lies from facts, myths from reality?
Or is it only used for identifying what has already been proven to be true ?
Seems to defeat the purpose doesn’t it ?
DocSavage · M
@AkioTsukino
[quote] Science itself is supposed to set religion aside. That's very difficult to do. But you aren't a scientist.[/quote]
Unless, you use the science to refute a religious claim , such as those made in the book of genesis.
[quote] Science is distorted by militant radical fundamentalist atheists in a religious fervor. That's what you are. So they can do away with God. That is what baffles me about them. [/quote]
What about militant radical fundamentalist creationist, in a religious fervor that wish to do away with science, in order to promote their beliefs onto a public that doesn’t share them. Does that make sense to you ?
Fight fire with fire. Easy to understand.
[quote] Science itself is supposed to set religion aside. That's very difficult to do. But you aren't a scientist.[/quote]
Unless, you use the science to refute a religious claim , such as those made in the book of genesis.
[quote] Science is distorted by militant radical fundamentalist atheists in a religious fervor. That's what you are. So they can do away with God. That is what baffles me about them. [/quote]
What about militant radical fundamentalist creationist, in a religious fervor that wish to do away with science, in order to promote their beliefs onto a public that doesn’t share them. Does that make sense to you ?
Fight fire with fire. Easy to understand.