This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DocSavage · M
@AkioTsukino
And he says we’re idiots.
Then it is no longer science. Science is a method of investigation. Not a belief system. It examines truth, it doesn't decide it. There is no point in investigating what everyone already knows. Science doesn't display truth. It doesn't dictate it.
So now science is not a religion. It doesn’t do anything, just looks at what everyone already knows to be true.And he says we’re idiots.
This message was deleted by its author.
DocSavage · M
@AkioTsukino
Tell me Chuckles, can science be used to reveal truths , to separate lies from facts, myths from reality?
Or is it only used for identifying what has already been proven to be true ?
Seems to defeat the purpose doesn’t it ?
Then it is no longer science. Science is a method of investigation. Not a belief system. It examines truth, it doesn't decide it. There is no point in investigating what everyone already knows. Science doesn't display truth. It doesn't dictate it.
Tell me Chuckles, can science be used to reveal truths , to separate lies from facts, myths from reality?
Or is it only used for identifying what has already been proven to be true ?
Seems to defeat the purpose doesn’t it ?
DocSavage · M
@AkioTsukino
Fight fire with fire. Easy to understand.
Science itself is supposed to set religion aside. That's very difficult to do. But you aren't a scientist.
Unless, you use the science to refute a religious claim , such as those made in the book of genesis. Science is distorted by militant radical fundamentalist atheists in a religious fervor. That's what you are. So they can do away with God. That is what baffles me about them.
What about militant radical fundamentalist creationist, in a religious fervor that wish to do away with science, in order to promote their beliefs onto a public that doesn’t share them. Does that make sense to you ?Fight fire with fire. Easy to understand.