"Logic is a little tweeting bird chirping in a meadow. Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad." Spock, Star Trek (1966-1969): Season 2, Episode 8 I Mudd
"Logic is the little tweeting bird chirping in the lonesome school of thought." Oscar Wilde
So who's Logic will you use?
Logic is like perspectives, no two have the same versions.
Who's truth?
Who's goals?
Who's persuasion or coordination?
Who's goal of creative or pluralistic insights?
The perspectives are still infinite.
And so one person's logic is another person's illogic accordingly.
GTP 5.0 conclusion response to the above...
So: there’s no single “whose logic” to use — choose the logic appropriate to your premises and goals, and be explicit about them. If you want, tell me a concrete disagreement or goal and I’ll show how different logics lead to different conclusions.
And once again it's upon the goal, which is infinite.
Any attempts to make sence of Chaos, can only conclude in Chaos again. Making Chaos the origin of order.
It is better to accept that human nature is chaotic. Just so you don't make the mistake of saying their way is illogical. That many may not understand their logic is simply irrelevant because of this infinite natures.
