European History is intricate... so many characters and so many interlinking dynamics
It is hard to get a grip on it...
US and British are relatively easy to make a mindmap...
US and British are relatively easy to make a mindmap...
26-30, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SomeMichGuy · M
Popobandar4 · 26-30, M
@SomeMichGuy technically they are not lol, they actively tried to ensure isolation ...
SomeMichGuy · M
@Popobandar4 Technically, they are.
The Celts weren't autochthonous, nor were the Vikings, Romans, Angles, Saxons, Jutes...
Isolation doesn't change the DNA...
The Celts weren't autochthonous, nor were the Vikings, Romans, Angles, Saxons, Jutes...
Isolation doesn't change the DNA...
Popobandar4 · 26-30, M
@SomeMichGuy by that definition, Australia is not a continent either... nor the Americas, at least not now ,
And East Asians should be separated from the Middle Easterns 😂
And East Asians should be separated from the Middle Easterns 😂
SomeMichGuy · M
@Popobandar4 Not sure how you figure Australia.
The Americas are continents but don't seem to have any self-originating humans any more than the British. [Note that this is different from cradles of civilization.]
There DOES seem to be a time during the land bridge where the mix of peoples whose DNA fed into that (likely) first wave of immigration created a new mix, but the DNA of the constituent peoples hasn't been lost.
Your only talking on the order of 10 k-yr ago, not millions. On that time scale, there isn't huge DNA drift, right?
Again not sure what your East Asian/Middle Eastern point is...
The Americas are continents but don't seem to have any self-originating humans any more than the British. [Note that this is different from cradles of civilization.]
There DOES seem to be a time during the land bridge where the mix of peoples whose DNA fed into that (likely) first wave of immigration created a new mix, but the DNA of the constituent peoples hasn't been lost.
Your only talking on the order of 10 k-yr ago, not millions. On that time scale, there isn't huge DNA drift, right?
Again not sure what your East Asian/Middle Eastern point is...
Popobandar4 · 26-30, M
@SomeMichGuy well you contested the idea and said aren't British Europeans , ... I know they are, and have their own history as well... I just said European History is intricate...and then tried to prove it with Genealogy, whereas it is a geographical term and i can talking geographically ...
I read how people got to Americas and Australia and all.. the Middle Eastern reference was also in the same context
I read how people got to Americas and Australia and all.. the Middle Eastern reference was also in the same context