Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why So Much Technical Illiteracy? (Among politicians and journalists)

Inspired by Port Talbot and Scunthorpe Steelworks; but with parallels in many other fields.


Politicians of all parties and systems are supposed to make policies. Journalists are supposed to inform us of those policies, and explain where necessary.

I do not expect Degree-level expositions, but the discussion and coverages of the fate of the iron and steel industry in the UK showed desperate lack of understanding by both sets of people. No wonder they struggle with any problems related to science and engineering.

I have never worked in a steelworks, coal-mine or ironstone quarry but even I know...

- The difference between Iron and Steel.

- That a blast-furnace does not make steel. It makes raw iron from its ore.

- That a blast-furnace is not fuelled with coal. It uses coke (distilled coal) as both fuel and reducing-agent. Plus limestone as a flux.

- That Electric-Arc and other furnace types refine raw iron and recover scrap iron and steel. Not ore-smelting*.

- The three primary products from the raw "pig iron" from the blast-furnace: pure iron for electrical equipment, cast-iron for machine parts, pure iron as the base ingredient of the huge range of steels .


Where did I learn these? Initially, in school science and geography lessons!

Come on, policy-makers and reporters, do some learning!

......

* At present. Arc-furnaces were used for iron-smelting in Sweden, Germany and America a hundred years ago. They still need a reducing-agent which I think could now be hydrogen. They do of course require vast amounts of electricity and a steady supply of the consumable electrodes.
Top | New | Old
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
Thank goodness for the 'old fashioned' teachers who taught us that kind of thing, I can still remember drawing (copying from a text book) a diagram showing how a blast furnace works. The UKs expensive electric generation does not help a financial case for on-shore steel manufacture, but the security of supply is a compelling argument for it. Nevertheless, I am not sure how we are going to manage (what we are assured are the short term) high costs of production.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@FreddieUK Not "old-fashioned teachers" but a matter of what they are told to teach.

The point about very high electricity (and gas) prices is very important, and one that really does need sorting out.
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
@ArishMell I use the term 'old fashioned' in a neutral way. It was the way it was and I have no time for the dismissal of the former ways as useless and the modern ways (however defined) as wonderful. I been in the situation of a moderniser and around long enough to be considered 'stuck in the past', so I try to respect all those making an honest attempt to educate young people.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@FreddieUK Thankyou. yes, I realised that you were referring more to the system than the people, but as I don't have children I don't know very much about what they are taught, or not, these days.
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
Electric arc with hydrogen is the only long term practical and economical way of producing iron in the UK unless one wants to reopen both coal mines and coking plants. The electricity can be supplied by nuclear power or renewables.

But is there really much point? Do we have a supply of iron ore onshore?
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@ninalanyon We still have coal though re-opening closed underground mines may be impossible for practical reasons - let alone whatever Just Stop Everything might say.

I don't know the status of iron-ore. I don't think there is much left. The big ore-field in Northamptonshire, shallow enough for open-cast mining, closed decades ago.

I think the major question to address is where we obtain the materials, be it ore and coke (or coking-coal), pig-iron or refined iron and steel. I think we have started to wake up to the strategic, economic and political idiocy of giving so much to the People's Republic of China; and that includes the iron and steel industry. Of course the Scunthorpe plant is "uneconomical" to the Chinese company "owners": the ultimate owner is the Chinese government with a strategic motive to close the plant, profit or loss. Just as they could stifle supplies or ruin the industries of so much else, to countries with whom they might fall out.

As far as iron and steel go though, beyond the politics is the biggest ignorance of all: that so few seem to realise that Iron is far more important than any other metallic element irrespective of cost density. Even Gold, despite its price and having applications in electronics and medicine, is virtually useless for any more than looking pretty.

Iron is the fundamental element; the Steels are alloys of Iron with trace additions to form the fundamental materials, for virtually everything we do, use or own.

So what happens? We take it for granted, have no idea how it "happens", where it's from, how it supports our lives and livelihoods. And we don't question the politicians', journalists' and campaigners' inability to tell us Iron from Steel, energy from power, a railway locomotive from a train, etc..

.......

Oh, and the element Fe even supports our lives physiologically: in the haemoglobin!

 
Post Comment