@
Elena05 It is not just about explosions. And even newer generations have not been always safe. And at some point, they will decline in performance and safety as everything else does. Besides, there are still always safety check ups. And they are there for a reason. Nobody needs a safety check-up, if there were not any risks. Besides, as I said before: there are still many other risks, e.g. nuclear waste disposal, attacks during wars, civil wars,terrorist attacks.Generally, the waste generated by nuclear reactors remains radioactive for tens to hundreds of thousands of years, Nuclear proliferation, National security, Accidents, Cancer risk, Energy production, not enough sites, Cost.The costs of nuclear energy are borne by the public at large rather than the actual energy producers. Taking into account all costs involved, nuclear power is a costly form of energy. Mining Lung Cancer Risk, Carbon-Equivalent Emissions and Air Pollution, High Operating Costs
Unlike renewables, which are now the cheapest energy sources, nuclear costs are on the rise, and many plants are being shut down or in danger of being shut down for economic reasons. Initial capital costs, fuel, and maintenance costs are much higher for nuclear plants than wind and solar, and nuclear projects tend to suffer cost overruns and construction delays. The price of renewable energy has fallen significantly over the past decade, and it projected to continue to fall. Furthermore, nuclear energy covers less than three percent of the total global energy demand. Even without increasing this low share, uranium resources will be depleted by the end of this century. Reactors using other types of radioactive material than uranium, such as plutonium or thorium, are much more accident-prone.
Uranium mining leaves large areas contaminated by radioactive radiation.
And I could go on. Of course, nuclear power also has advantages, but also many disadvantages.