I Think Global Climate Change Must Be Stopped

The climate change cult is here to take away your freedoms and regulate your way of life. Have people have awoken to the BS? Some have but those within the cult will never wake up.

Why don't the members of the climate change cult realize that their whole cult has been exposed, exposed by a real scientist who used to worship Obama but now says he is dead wrong on climate change. The reason they won't wake up is because a cult is never open to any real facts or evidence.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/kathleen-brown/nobel-prize-winning-physicist-obama-dead-wrong-global-warming-0

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/07/06/nobel-prize-winning-scientist-who-endorsed-obama-now-says-prez-is-ridiculous-dead-wrong-on-global-warming/

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/7/nobel-physicist-obama-dead-wrong-global-warming/

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

greenmountaingal · 70-79, F

UN Agenda 21 and ICLEI have been disasters for the US.

doctorlove · M

Yes disasters! Look at how [b]terrible[/b] things are here in the US compared to elsewhere! We're saving the environment for nothing!

If only we could green light some more mountain top excavation eh? Coal ain't coming back, chica. And it ain't because of climate protocols.

greenmountaingal · 70-79, F

@doctorlove: These rules and regulations do not necessarily save the environment, certainly not globally, because the rules allow China and some other countries to pollute quite a bit[i]more[/i] than the US. The idea is to suppress and ultimately destroy our economy while building up the economy of those countries who use slave labor or extremely cheap labor. Pollution, world wide, would be about the same.

questionWeaver

@greenmountaingal:

Mountain Gal ... kids were taught a big word in 2nd grade "enviromentalism" ... they were taught it means cute microbes ...

They like using the word ... cause they used to get gold stars.

doctorlove · M

So of I understand you correctly, you feel it would be terrible for us to not be able to continue as the primary polluter of the world. You want to retain the title.

Here's something you may not have read. The largest economy of consumption - built on slavery itself - purchases the lion's share of goods produced by the world's slave labor. Take a stab at which consumers those would be?

greenmountaingal · 70-79, F

@doctorlove: We need something better than UN Agenda 21 and demonizing the US.

doctorlove · M

We need to lead. Period. We are the richest nation in the world. Instead of using our wealth to lead the way on environmental issues, we are more concerned about how to make our rich richer.

If speaking about our history of slavery and reckless resource exploitation constitutes 'demonizing' - so be it.

greenmountaingal · 70-79, F

@doctorlove: We ended slavery here. Reckless resource exploitation can be addressed without UN Agenda 21 and needs to effect all countries. We are not the only country with faults and bad historical events.

doctorlove · M

So if everyone doesn't want to save the planet, we shouldn't either. Got it. You do know your terrifying Agenda 21 is totally voluntary?

Makemeluvit · 36-40, F

@greenmountaingal: we outsourced slavery to the country you used as an example of a growing economy- also I've literally been stuck in that same country because my flight couldn't take off- not because of snow or fog- but because it was a thick smog day- I'm not a scientist I'm not going to argue on that end- but I can say from personal experience China is a terrible example

greenmountaingal · 70-79, F

@Makemeluvit: the UN Agenda 21 deal allows China a lot of freedom to pollute.

Makemeluvit · 36-40, F

China has allowed China to pollute

Makemeluvit · 36-40, F

They made a conscientious choice to shit in their own nest- I for one prefer not to follow suit