Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

We're finally having a moment in the sun!

It’s been a good couple of weeks for the sun. Not just because it produced the aurora that swept the internet but because it became even clearer that the remarkable escalation of solar power is starting to put a real dent in the prospects for fossil fuel.

Over under the big top, solar power is in the center ring, and wind and batteries are in the other two, and what an act they’re putting on!

Here’s how the European think tank Carbon Brief put it this week in their analysis of the latest numbers from the International Energy Agency

Global electricity generation from solar will quadruple by 2030 and help to push coal power into reverse, according to Carbon Brief analysis of data from the International Energy Agency (IEA).

The IEA’s latest World Energy Outlook 2024 shows solar overtaking nuclear, wind, hydro, gas and, finally, coal, to become the world’s single-largest source of electricity by 2033.

This solar surge will help kickstart the “age of electricity”, the agency says, where rapidly expanding clean electricity and “inherently” greater efficiency will push fossil fuels into decline.

As a result, the world’s energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions will reach a peak “imminently”, the IEA says, with its data indicating a turning point in 2025.

Is this fast enough to catch up with climate change?

It is not

Despite these changes, the world is on track to cut CO2 emissions to just 4% below 2023 levels by 2030, the agency warns, resulting in warming of 2.4C above pre-industrial temperatures.

It says there is an “increasingly narrow, but still achievable” path to staying below 1.5C, which would need more clean electricity, faster electrification and a 33% cut in emissions by 2030.

But it is by far the most hopeful thing happening on our planet at the moment—finally, finally, we’re in the race. And if we push we could speed it up.

The numbers are already remarkable, and as far as I can tell almost no one knows them. The world is installing more than a gigawatt of solar power every day, and has been for more than a year—the number continues to steadily increase. A gigawatt is about the size of a nuclear plant—an old-style nuclear power plant. People are building—every day—the solar equivalent of a nuclear reactor, at a tiny fraction of the cost.

To give just one example of this pell-mell trend, in California the state just passed a law that should allow farmers on land that’s turned droughty because of climate change to generate 20 gigawatts of solar power.


What AB 2661 does is it provides us the ability to be the master planner for this solar development, which we’re excited about, because it allows us to be more thoughtful about how the solar goes in and how it’s integrated with the surrounding land use and incorporated into the district,” said Jeff Payne, the other assistant general manager of Westlands.

The plan allows for flexibility with land use and some of the land that is transitioned to solar may end up going back to agricultural use years later, said Payne. That flexibility has been key for Westlands’ growers who want to maintain their agricultural heritage, said Payne.

According to SJVWater, the website covering water issues in the San Joaquin Valley, this one region could provide a sixth of California’s electricity by 2035. And California is, remember, the fifth largest economy on earth.


The solar story gets better and better and better: this week one manufacturer announced that their new panels—guranteeded for 40 years!—will produce one hundred times as much energy as it takes to make them.

I’m not telling you this is going to save the earth. The earth is balanced pretty perilously, as this month’s State of the Climate Report from a passel of leading researchers put it.

We are on the brink of an irreversible climate disaster. This is a global emergency beyond any doubt. Much of the very fabric of life on Earth is imperiled. We are stepping into a critical and unpredictable new phase of the climate crisis.

But I am telling you that the numbers coming out of the solar revolution are suddenly big, dwarfing everything else.

And we need big numbers.

Text by Bill McKibben The Crucial Years Substack.

https://billmckibben.substack.com/p/stare-at-the-sun
Top | New | Old
daydeeo · 61-69, M
"We are on the brink of an irreversible climate disaster. This is a global emergency beyond any doubt. Much of the very fabric of life on Earth is imperiled. We are stepping into a critical and unpredictable new phase of the climate crisis." - Chicken Little, climate expert.
pdockal · 56-60, M
fossil fuels are used to make solar panels in a number of ways, including:

Melting silica rock
Coal-fired electricity plants are used to melt silica rock at high temperatures to produce silicon, which is used in solar panels.

Manufacturing equipment
The manufacturing equipment used to make solar panels is often powered by fossil fuels.

Construction
The manufacturing plants that make solar panels are often constructed using materials that are made from fossil fuels, like concrete.

Petrochemicals
Some of the copolymers used in solar panels contain ethylene, a petrochemical derived from oil and natural gas.

Polyvinyl chloride (PVCs)
Coal is used to produce PVCs, a toxic substance used in solar panels.

Transportation
The raw materials used to make solar panels are often mined far from the manufacturing facilities, which can contribute to CO2 emissions.
@pdockal As I said:

Ranges are already comparable to an average gasoline/diesel car, and charging times are coming down all the time. Besides, most people charge their EVs at home, so charging time is largely irrelevant.

And it's still VERY early days in the EV revolution.

It's getting there.

Also, yes, wind turbine blades are increasingly being recycled. Can you recycle the very earth that provides our fuel that is then spewed into the air? No.
pdockal · 56-60, M
@Mesthartiya

You cant drive EVs across counrty ... hell you barely get 300 mile range especially in extreme temperatures
EVs hhave to be monitored for reignition .... taken to holding facility
Putting a charging station into your house can be very expensive especially if your pannel needs updating
EVs are more expensive to purchase than gas powered vehicles
The mining for the prescious metals isnt good for the enviornment (do your research)
Making EVS creates MORE emissions then gas powered vehicles ..... Almost 4 tonnes of CO2 are released during the production process of a single electric car and, in order to break even, the vehicle must be used for at least 8 years to offset the initial emissions by 0.5 tonnes of prevented emissions annually.
BMW plans to roll out hydrogen to eventually replace their EVs
Unless you are using solar pannels your still using fossil fuels to charge your vehicle so whats the difference to putting gasoline into your vehicle?
Can the existing grid handel ALL the electric vehicles ... doubt it


I bet if you actually look @ ALL the numbers you will see the only real savings are the emissions per vehicle & nothing more.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment