Theoretical spectrum
It can be dry and dull sometimes, these rivers of learning can be, the enthusiasm dies down and stuff. That is why some theoretical standards are in place so that the zeal for the topic spectrum always remains high. These may sound childish, but they are supposed to be, like a young person, these are little games with toys.
The personages sourced are like members of sports teams, the teams are competing with each other, who will win??!!
However it's not really about winning, but about getting along.
Does the sport matter then if the end result aimed for is against the idea of contest?
No, there shall always be contests, they happen so that the activities remain, the importance of winning remains only in so far as it gets the players to play good.
This is a reason that is similar to my conception of the 5 points of reformed doctrine that distinguishes them from Arminian teaching, the remonstrance.
For example, one does good works because one is saved, not in order to be saved. So then how come so many of the former thought find it a reason to do not good things, they say and do different things. How does a human mind make sense of what is purported to be a divine thing.
Other theoretical standards are
There may be inner presuppositions, however there is a need to compare everything together, to constantly be comparing, and a moment in Godard's Alphaville serves as a cinematic motif, where Eddie Constantine keeps turning a picture around to look at the image and what's written on the other side, keep comparing, ceaselessly.
The feeling of the sources has a higher importance for me than taking notes and keeping close track of the things being said, thereby what i'm after is not learning by rote (a phrase Kierkegaard used a lot), but a sensorial tactile gradual coming to terms, like in a Mannix episode when Mannix is temporarily blind and must learn how to function without sight, with my kindle i am learning how to function in the world of thoughts, without the basic qualities others have who have access to things i don't. It's a part of the game to always be putting myself at a disadvantage to make it more unlikely that real progress would occur. For if i were to progress, i'd be faced with other things that i at least now have no taste for.
The personages sourced are like members of sports teams, the teams are competing with each other, who will win??!!
However it's not really about winning, but about getting along.
Does the sport matter then if the end result aimed for is against the idea of contest?
No, there shall always be contests, they happen so that the activities remain, the importance of winning remains only in so far as it gets the players to play good.
This is a reason that is similar to my conception of the 5 points of reformed doctrine that distinguishes them from Arminian teaching, the remonstrance.
For example, one does good works because one is saved, not in order to be saved. So then how come so many of the former thought find it a reason to do not good things, they say and do different things. How does a human mind make sense of what is purported to be a divine thing.
Other theoretical standards are
There may be inner presuppositions, however there is a need to compare everything together, to constantly be comparing, and a moment in Godard's Alphaville serves as a cinematic motif, where Eddie Constantine keeps turning a picture around to look at the image and what's written on the other side, keep comparing, ceaselessly.
The feeling of the sources has a higher importance for me than taking notes and keeping close track of the things being said, thereby what i'm after is not learning by rote (a phrase Kierkegaard used a lot), but a sensorial tactile gradual coming to terms, like in a Mannix episode when Mannix is temporarily blind and must learn how to function without sight, with my kindle i am learning how to function in the world of thoughts, without the basic qualities others have who have access to things i don't. It's a part of the game to always be putting myself at a disadvantage to make it more unlikely that real progress would occur. For if i were to progress, i'd be faced with other things that i at least now have no taste for.
SW-User