This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User
Posts that require thinking aren't well received. Only the author might benefit by organizing their thoughts.

SW-User
A good example is my post on choosing an afterlife belief. Cutting edge information given one heart and a few inappropriate responses (since removed).
Silemhaff · 31-35, M
@SW-User I saw it now.. And it's a perfect example of overthinking, lmao x) Take it eaasy

SW-User
@Silemhaff Another inappropriate comment from someone unaccustomed to thinking.
Silemhaff · 31-35, M
@SW-User why so rude? I'm just being chill.. and if i want to discuss metaphysics and stuff, i can do that.. It's just that i find it meaningless. I'm not a believer, btw

SW-User
@Silemhaff You were rude. Laughing at and condemning what you didn't understand. You didn't even realize that your belief was taken into account and is associated with failure to value reason. Stop pretending to be interested in getting smarter.
Silemhaff · 31-35, M
@SW-User All that because i said it's 'overthinking'? okay.. The point is that no one (literally, no one) can have a claim about after-life. No one can test it, that's why it's not obvious to have a discussion about that.

SW-User
@Silemhaff You're making bad assumptions you were advised to make. The evidence does exist, else I wouldn't have been able to describe the structure. Goodbye.