Are you genius?

[b][big][c=#003BB2]Then tell me the answer..[/c][/big][/b]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SteelHands · 61-69, M

Based on the available evidence and lacking the eight or the one to verify the structure it's 50.

4+4 added to 5+5 results in the same thing as 9+9.

ImKelsey · 26-30, F

@SteelHands
4 sq + 4 = 20
5 sq + 5 = 30
6 sq + 6 = 42
7 sq + 7 = 56
9 sq + 9 = 90

SteelHands · 61-69, M

My reasoning has more evidence.

ImKelsey · 26-30, F

@SteelHands All of the evidence points to 90 being correct. The pattern holds true.

SteelHands · 61-69, M

@ImKelsey the "pattern" is broken at 7.

SteelHands · 61-69, M

@ImKelsey The operator present is a plus only. The fact is there are many assumptive ways to get that result of yours.

You lack an 8 to demonstrate the mathematical proof.

In math there's never more than one solution.

Mine is the only mathematically provable one.

ImKelsey · 26-30, F

@SteelHands How is the pattern broken at 7 if 7 sq + 7 = 56 as predicted?

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@ImKelsey @SteelHands the problem here is that it's not a math problem. It's a pattern problem.

Obviously 4+4 = 8 not 20
And therefore the falseness of the statement throws it out of math totally. The pattern was stated before my reply.