Are women as likely to be perverted as men? [I See Perverts]

@Sharon kind of disagree with "less likely to be considered perverts".

Especially after what happened to kiara on here.

It takes a lot of complaints to not only get banned nearly a dozen times then permanently banned.

Actually don't know of any guys getting permanently banned. I mean ALL their accounts.

@DeWayfarer [quote]Especially after what happened to kiara on here.[/quote]
What did happen? I've never heard of her before.

@Sharon a bunch of users harassed her is the best I can say. Just would not let up. One account after another got banned until it became permanent.

Sure she was posting nude images. Yet they were all legal and marked as nude. Biggest thing was she was describing what life in a bordello in India is like and not in a negative way. She was a self admitted prostitute. And that got to a lot of people. Especially when she was describing certain acts along with images then posing questions of those that replied.

She was very popular really! Just not by the moral minority that kept on harassing her.

@Sharon some links

https://similarworlds.com/15-NSFW/3083218-Why-people-need-to-chill-ass-and-be-respectful-of

https://similarworlds.com/15-NSFW/2926792-NSFW-The-absolute-feeling-of-bliss

https://similarworlds.com/15-NSFW/2926772-NSFW-When-youre-so-hot-that-even-your-friend-cant

https://similarworlds.com/15-NSFW/3163160-NSFW-Indian-Women-Stereotypes-Take-2-going-from

@Sharon she was posting stuff that was honest and real, unfortunately many of the people she featured looked under age and because of the nature of the text and photos it fell under the heading of looking like child porn, it wasn't but here's the problem,

In many countries anything that looks like child porn is illegal, yes! Looks like, not is, this means that you can prove beyond doubt that the models are 20 but if the finished photo looks like child porn it's illegal to host it, similar worlds was the host and therefore breaking some laws, it wasn't her fault, it wasn't similar worlds fault, it's just the way it is.

@Johnblackthorn if you noticed she often gave source of where she was getting her images. Places like reddit won't keep images of under aged girls any more so than they do here! 🤷‍♂️

And all her images other than herself were from such sites.

@DeWayfarer a lot of the stuff she used was removed by the mods of the relevant sub reddit, it depends on how active the mods are and how much reporting was going on.
But more importantly,

"another site has the same images"

will not stand up in court as your defence,so why risk your site being closed down and huge fines to keep one member.

@DeWayfarer [quote]Just not by the moral minority that kept on harassing her.[/quote]
This site, in fact the whole world, would be a far better place if we could get rid of those hate mongering busybodies.

@Johnblackthorn I know exactly how how this site operates. With only two admin and two moderators there's just no way to look at all the posts and replies of over a 100 thousand users themselves. Nor even just the images. I know this because I was an admin myself once a long time ago.

The site relies on either software or user reports to moderate. And even then they go on a "reputation" factor of those reporting.

In other words it's based on groupies and clicks that have nothing to do with the actual site operators.

It's also how a good deal of the site modifications are made. I know this because I have had "suggestions" actually used and all of my used suggestions were liked by many of those same groupies and clicks!

Any that were not liked by them just were not put into use!

So please...be real. That had nothing to do with legalities nor the admin and moderators themselves. Her banning was soley on the moral "minority" click!

This is similar the image removal process used!

Porn reports received.

CLUE! See flag warnings.

Number of reports analyzed by the software.

Reputation factors of the reports received calculated.

Reputation threshold met or not met by the software.

Report ignored with message or sent on to the admin.

CLUE! See ignored message sent to the reporting user.

Admin/moderators sees massive number of reports. Gives ok for the software to remove such images.

CLUE! all images on actual flagged post/reply removed. Not just one and not others.

Premade warnings given by software to offending users.

CLUE! All such warnings are the same. Not even a little bit different.

Gone are images none scene by the admin/moderators. Warnings given by software. Nor do they even want to see such images themselves nor make up warnings!

They have other things to do.

@Sharon actually my experience is that society is terrified of women enjoying sex and women's sexual pleasure and I know these things because a woman enjoying herself that way is something I very much so enjoy witnessing.