Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Physical Media Is Dead

I'm calling it now, this is my prediction. By the year 2100, we will no longer be using physical media. I may be off on the date, but I know for a fact in a few more generations, physical media will be gone forever.
We're living in an age where children are growing up with tablet computers and ipads, which are still new developments to me, and I'm only 21. I was born in an age where music and movies were stored on cassette tapes. I still have a bunch of VHS tapes from my childhood.
My point is I grew up in an age where physical media was a constant thing. You couldn't just watch a movie online, you had to have a physical copy to watch it. Yeah, you could get a pirate physical copy, but the point is it was still a physical, tangible object you had to physically own.
But now we live in a world where every piece of media can be broadcast to you via streaming or downloads. Almost every building, whether it be a home or a business, has wi-fi. There's rarely a time nowadays, especially in heavily populated areas like cities, that you'll be without a constant internet connection of some kind, even a weak one.
So how come physical media is going to die? Well, here's how.
We don't need it anymore. We're already at a point where we could stop printing books and burning discs, and it could mean huge changes for the world in terms of how much things cost and what kind of impact these products have on the environment. Imagine how many DVDs you own in your house, think of all the plastic that went into making the boxes, the discs, and the paper that went into the covers. On average a person owns 15 DVDs, so let's say ten people each have 15 DVDs. That's 150 DVDs in total. Those ten people could live together in an apartment building, so that's 150 DVDs for a single building.
How about books? I personally prefer holding a physical book, being able to see it and feel it in front of me, but I'm well aware there's no reason other than the aesthetic. E-books are not only safer and better for the environment, they're also a lot cheaper since you don't need to physically print the book onto paper.
With services like Steam, Netflix, Kindles and Spotify, there's no reason to go and buy physical media anymore. Hell, it makes more sense to go completely digital anyway. Take my word for it, in a few years the gangly spotty-faced youth will be burning books en-masse since we no longer need them. DVDs will be relics in museums. Physical media will be, in fact, dead.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Sicarium · 46-50, M
All that digital content is still stored on physical servers. We've just moved from VHS and CDs to server farms.
Nostromo · 41-45, M
Right. Control of media is now OUT of our hands and in the hands of the great, nebulous, 'they.' 'They' typically being the music, film and publishing industries.

It's like the stranglehold the church used to have on the free flow of information, only now the 'church' is/are corporate abominations.
twofacetoo · 26-30, M
Yes but this web-page you're looking at, can you hold it? No, you can hold the monitor you're seeing it displayed on, and you can hold the server it's saved to, but you're not holding the page itself. Same with how you can't hold the movie you're watching on Netflix, unless you also have it on DVD.
Nostromo · 41-45, M
@twofacetoo: Precisely. I can print (and thus hold) this web page and buy a physical copy of a movie. As long as I can, I will.

I'll concede, though, that maintaining control over media is getting progressively more difficult/cumbersome.
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@twofacetoo: So your real argument is about who controls physical media, not that physical media is dying.
Nostromo · 41-45, M
@Sicarium: Perspective is everything: it's only 'dying' from the perspective of those who consume it. :-{
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@Nostromo: Consumption has only increased.
Nostromo · 41-45, M
@Sicarium: Consumption, yes. Control, no. Ask around. How many of your friends still boast of large book, CD, DVD, etc. collections. If your friends are anything like mine, they'll look at you quizzically and grunt something like "do what?"

Remember, control is a function of ownership (and vise versa). If you don't own a tangible thing, you don't control it.
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@Nostromo: You never had total control of that CD and DVD collection. There were always laws against using it in any other way than you were allowed to. It's no different now. Before, you could copy a CD. Now, you can pirate the digital album. Either way, get caught, pay the fine. It has been and still is intellectual property.
Nostromo · 41-45, M
@Sicarium: I had complete control over those collections. I could elect to abide by copyright laws--or not. (In general I did and still do--with the perfectly legal exception of making a single, 'fair-use' copy.)

And I'm not gonna enter into an intellectual property argument other than to say that, as far as I'm concerned, government-created corporations (government entities) have no such rights. Individuals do. Business collectives do not.
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@Nostromo: Exactly. Nothing has changed. You could elect to abide by those laws, or not. Just like you can now, or not. Copying, pirating, it's the same thing.