When are the Comanche members gonna apologize to us Apache members for stealing our land and horses? [I Love Native Americans]
Some compensation would be nice, too.
41-45, M
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
SW-User
Which one was the first tribe to walk across the ice? That’s the real question
View 51 more replies »
uncleshawn · 41-45, M
@SW-User There is a tribe from Florida that looks 80% European -- in the original depictions of the people, I mean.
uncleshawn · 41-45, M
@SW-User Another idea is that there were peoples in North America before the Siberian-related ones came. So, again, this is super complex and hazy.
uncleshawn · 41-45, M
@SW-User There is a kind of DNA that is found more heavily in EAST North America that is related to people living in Western Europe. This DNA does not exist in Central and South American populations. What does this mean? Well, one obvious inference is that Europeans arrived by boat in North America, while Asians arrived other places.
This is an important thing....You will not find in the mainstream a theory that Europeans arrived in North America before or concurrent with the Siberian group (which were mixed European and Asian). Why not? This is an obvious theory to research. REASON: The current climate of "racism". The old view is that the original inhabitants all came from Asia. The new views are that the original inhabitants all came from Asia, though with mixed DNA. It must be from Asia. To suggest otherwise means a person is "racist". This is a prime example of how "science" is just as corrupt and full of nonsense as anything else on the earth.
The evidence points logically, I think, to this: the Americas were settled by peoples from both east and west, from both Asian and Europe -- arriving in both North America and South America. But which group arrived first, and what happened to these groups when they encountered one another.....way too hard to piece together. There are some oral traditions in various tribes that talk about what happened in ages that seem from the stories to be long before modern Europeans arrived, but "scholars" discount oral tradtions. A dumb thing that "scholars" are known for. Natives are "dumb" and their stories are dumb....these scholars who work so hard to say they are "not racist".
This is an important thing....You will not find in the mainstream a theory that Europeans arrived in North America before or concurrent with the Siberian group (which were mixed European and Asian). Why not? This is an obvious theory to research. REASON: The current climate of "racism". The old view is that the original inhabitants all came from Asia. The new views are that the original inhabitants all came from Asia, though with mixed DNA. It must be from Asia. To suggest otherwise means a person is "racist". This is a prime example of how "science" is just as corrupt and full of nonsense as anything else on the earth.
The evidence points logically, I think, to this: the Americas were settled by peoples from both east and west, from both Asian and Europe -- arriving in both North America and South America. But which group arrived first, and what happened to these groups when they encountered one another.....way too hard to piece together. There are some oral traditions in various tribes that talk about what happened in ages that seem from the stories to be long before modern Europeans arrived, but "scholars" discount oral tradtions. A dumb thing that "scholars" are known for. Natives are "dumb" and their stories are dumb....these scholars who work so hard to say they are "not racist".