This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
persistentone22 · M
Prejudice against religion is normally subsumed under the word racism because a more precise word does not exist in English. This argument is frequently made online such as here:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/02/antisemitism-is-racism-malky-mackay-david-whelan-mario-balotelli
The post I referenced was trying to argue down a racist post here:
https://similarworlds.com/story?fid=7815882&tid=13585&sort=1&name=I-Have-Legitimate-Concerns-About-Islam-And-That--0
Everything in your post suggests you should have agreed with my post and should have argued against the original racist post I was trying to call out. Instead you latch onto two sentences in the most superficial way and just ignore the entire point of my post, which you would have understood if you had read just two paragraphs.
I don't think you read my post. I don't think you understood any of it. I think your entire conversation is about the wrong points.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/02/antisemitism-is-racism-malky-mackay-david-whelan-mario-balotelli
The post I referenced was trying to argue down a racist post here:
https://similarworlds.com/story?fid=7815882&tid=13585&sort=1&name=I-Have-Legitimate-Concerns-About-Islam-And-That--0
Everything in your post suggests you should have agreed with my post and should have argued against the original racist post I was trying to call out. Instead you latch onto two sentences in the most superficial way and just ignore the entire point of my post, which you would have understood if you had read just two paragraphs.
I don't think you read my post. I don't think you understood any of it. I think your entire conversation is about the wrong points.