The white genocide agenda, sometimes called the Kalergi plan, is a documented and observable fact. Just read their playbook "Practical Idealism:

@CountScrofula No, it's a conspiracy theory that Nazis use.

@BohemianBabe Lemme cook.

@CountScrofula That is good that you have an open mind about this. The truth fears no investigation. Most will immediately get emotional and attack by reflex action. Yes, you can read it. Just look up on google the book mentioned in this post: "Practical Idealism: The Kalergi Plan To Destroy European Peoples" by Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi.

@SW-User Well that led me down a rabbit hole.

So he published a book called Practical Idealism in 1925 with a passage about how he anticipates that all future peoples will be mixed race. So that's a hundred year old book anyone can read that doesn't have any weird plans in it.


That's the quote. Just some 1925 future predictions and pretty common shit for the time. The book you told me to google appears to be some sort of weird retelling of the book that notably dominates SEO despite being from 2019. He never wrote a book with "The Kalegri Plan to Destroy European Peoples" in the title, nor anything like it.

The publisher of THAT book is Omnias Veritas, is a French publisher with texts like this:


I think you should more carefully investigate your beliefs.

@CountScrofula he already blamed the Jewish people for the Holodomor. The brain is beyond saving, we'll need to amputate.

@CountScrofula Thanks for doing the research!!

This "Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi" reference sounds like the kind of thing a Russian troll would mention in hopes of spreading false rumors🤣😂

Not that I'm accusing the OP of delighting in Putin's pizda, no, far from it🤣😂🤣😂

@basilfawlty89 Yes please do.

@CountScrofula Wait a minute. Stop and think about something for a second. You just quoted "Man of the distant future will be a hybrid. Today's races and castes will fall victim to the growing defeat of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, outwardly similar to the ancient Egyptian, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals." From practical idealism

And then completely missed the fact that our elites are literally following that and that whole book as a blueprint to a T, with the anti white propaganda that they're pushing in the media, TV and the school system and the calculated mass migration that is only occuring in European counties, lowering white birth rates, which is considered cold genocide. Just read the United Nations definition of cold genocide. They admit this. Sure, it can't be defined as hot genocide, but it is cold genocide. Like I have already stated, they openly and gladly declare that whites will be a minority by 2045.

In the modern world, many crimes against whites are covered up and not shown on the media. In the modern world, white families spend their whole lives working to send their children to schools where they will be told just how despicable they are. In the modern world, famous celebrities bragging about the end of white men are the ones "speaking truth to power". In the modern world, New York Times editors can openly write about how they get joy in being cruel to white men and keep their jobs, having no consequences. University professors can openly say that they want white genocide and keep their jobs. If you don't see the clear anti white agenda, you haven't been paying attention.

So yeah, while that subtitle might not have been in the original book, it has been added because what was written in that book is being followed as a guide (just like 1984 is) so it was appropriately added in modern versions of the book.

It is you who needs to carefully investigate your beliefs and do more research on this issue.

@SW-User Yes, there's a lot of anti-white racism. No, this conspiracy theory is not real.

Kalergi wasn't anti-white, he just thought race-mixing was good for humanity. If that makes him racist against Whites, then he was racist against every race.

@BohemianBabe You didn't read or aren't processing/comprehending what I wrote. I never said that Kalergi himself had a specific anti-white agenda. I said that our elites are following Kalergi's book as a blueprint and using that to specifically target white people above all other people's, as you don't see the calculated migration crisis happening in non-europeans places like Africa and Asia. You don't see any other race being targeted and attacked in the media, on TV and in the school system like White's are.

But ultimately Kalergi was anti white because he was anti every race. Yes, Kalergi absolutely was racist against every race because by wanting to mix every race together and create one flat grey homogenized blob, you are getting rid of every race, so you are against true racial diversity. Integration on a macro scale is against true diversity, since segregation is actually what preserves all the races and keeps true diversity alive. So, if someone wants to get rid of all the races, they are by definition against every race.

@SW-User what makes you think one would be against every race? Maybe it’s just not caring about race at all. We would still be individuals with different ancestry, all to be acknowledged and celebrated.

@SW-User
If Kalergi's book was outlining an anti-white agenda, wouldn't he have to be anti-white at least functionally?


That's not being racist, it's just seeing the social construct of race as something to be overcome. Even if you disagree with him, it would be a huge stretch to say that he was "against every race," when really he just thought mixing would end racism.
Also, he didn't have a plan to cause race-mixing on a mass level, he just saw it as something that would eventually happen.

Bee tee dubs, I totally disagree with Kalergi on this, I don't think mixing would end racism, since race is a social construct. In South Africa and Latin America there's a lot of racism involving racial categories that don't even exist in the West. I just don't think Kalergi was trying to cause harm with this view.

@BohemianBabe
Kalergi was anti-white functionally because he wanted to get rid of every race, which includes the white race. I am just trying to clarify my point that while the book does not have a specific focus only on European people, the elites are using it to target European countries with that idea.


Even if his intention is not racist, that doesn't mean it isn't racist. How is wanting to get rid of all racial diversity not racist? That is wanting to change the true differences that exist in nature. How is that not an attack on all people's? The plan to want to make everyone the same, to blur the lines between the sexes and the races has everything to do with us being easier to control. It is much easier to dupe and corral all of the people on the planet if everyone on the planet is exactly the same. Whether or not he was trying to cause harm with this view is irrelevant, because the fact is that it does cause harm and it will be utilized by an elite that does not have our best interests at heart.


You're right that it certainly would not end racism. However, you are wrong to say that race is a social construct. It is a biological reality, much deeper than skin. Explain to me the cognitive dissonance and Orwellian doublethink of the left, who says that white privilege is very real but race is just a social construct.

@SW-User
That's an enormous stretch. The elites like mass immigration because it's cheap labor for rich people. That is so not the same as what Kalergi said. Plus, Kalergi didn't have a plan in his book to get everyone to race-mix or whatever. So even if some elites were inspired by him, it's not like they're following some kinda blueprint he wrote up.


Because racism is hatred or discrimination based on race or ethnicity. Thinking race-mixing will end racism isn't that.


Again, there was no plan. And this is what it actually says in Kalergi's book: "The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals."
Basically, he thought that when race was no longer an issue, we would have more diversity in the form of individuality. Is he right? I don't know. But he definitely wasn't trying to make everyone the same.

@BohemianBabe Weren't you just trying to argue that the whites are subjects of systemic discrimination?

@CountScrofula Yes, but I don't believe it's a result of the Kalergi Plan.