Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Believe We Were Created: Change My Mind

The basics. Start simple, from the top. Don't preach. My first question is, what is the scientific method?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
Well not saying that there isn't anything spiritual but if you look at the way animals are designed biologically and humans, we don't have effective design systems. So either god was drunk or we weren't created. Even if we were created, that doesn't explain poor design flaws.
This message was deleted by its author.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@AkioTsukino But you're a perfect being as god and then designed something that wasn't effective. Logically it doesn't make sense.
This message was deleted by its author.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AkioTsukino [quote]According to the Bible[/quote]

Seriously? That’s the extent of your reasoning?
@newjaninev2 [quote]Seriously? That’s the extent of your reasoning?[/quote]

If you have an alternative source for the question of sin I would be happy to hear it.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AkioTsukino What sin?
This message was deleted by its author.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AkioTsukino Sin being..?
@newjaninev2 Sin being to miss the mark. Archers miss the target. That's sin. God says don't touch the tree and you touch the tree. Sin. The speed limit is 55 and you go 60. Sin.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AkioTsukino And the mark is defined by... what?

Oh, your particular book! Is that the standard?

if so... why?
@newjaninev2 Sort of. The mark was defined to Adam and Eve, according to that book. In that specific case. The standard? Depends. These are just words. God. Hell. Faith. Sin. Evolution. Just words.

The standard. Are you thinking in your quasi-science? Sin just means miss the target, or mark. The Bible says Adam and Eve sinned and we inherit that sinful nature.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AkioTsukino Your entire claim rests on the undemonstrated veracity of a book that refers to a magical entity that there’s no compelling necessity to even postulate