I Believe We Were Created: Change My Mind
The basics. Start simple, from the top. Don't preach. My first question is, what is the scientific method?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
The Scientific Method isn’t a method. It’s a [i]methodology,[/i] a collection of methods.
This should give you the general idea:
https://fs.blog/richard-feynman-the-key-to-science/
Note especially that the methodology requires the capacity to be wrong.
That immediately disqualifies religion.
This should give you the general idea:
https://fs.blog/richard-feynman-the-key-to-science/
Note especially that the methodology requires the capacity to be wrong.
That immediately disqualifies religion.
AkioTsukino · M
@newjaninev2 I've already disqualified religion. I loath organized religion. But it doesn't disqualify religion. Rather, it is religious.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AkioTsukino What is religious?
AkioTsukino · M
@newjaninev2 [quote]What is religious?[/quote]
The capacity to be wrong. You said that the methodology requires the capacity to be wrong which immediately disqualifies religion. I don't know how you came to that conclusion but it's moot because I've already done that some other way. I'm getting sidetracked. Evolutionists [b]LOVE[/b] to talk about this, of course, and I'm taking a much needed break from religion for the later half of April. Then I have to go back to working on my site for the most part.
Fascinating as it is I have to keep focused.
The capacity to be wrong. You said that the methodology requires the capacity to be wrong which immediately disqualifies religion. I don't know how you came to that conclusion but it's moot because I've already done that some other way. I'm getting sidetracked. Evolutionists [b]LOVE[/b] to talk about this, of course, and I'm taking a much needed break from religion for the later half of April. Then I have to go back to working on my site for the most part.
Fascinating as it is I have to keep focused.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AkioTsukino Religion cannot accommodate the possibility that it is wrong. To do so would be to admit that their godhead is fallible.
In fact, those who question infallibility are commonly driven out, or murdered.
Kill the heretic!
In fact, those who question infallibility are commonly driven out, or murdered.
Kill the heretic!
AkioTsukino · M
@newjaninev2 [Sigh] Distractions. Let's put it to some use. The assumption that science doesn't have it's own heretics, godhead, infallibility and murder is naïve.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AkioTsukino For example?
AkioTsukino · M
@newjaninev2 That's what I'm asking you. If you ask me about religion I can give a detailed history.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@AkioTsukino I care not one whit about religion