@
pdockal says
Your missing the point
You're missing the point. All other administrations who have considered Greenland have gone through proper diplomatic channels.
NONE of those prior admins proposed
"Incinerating the hard-won trust of loyal allies." Not just one ally, mind you, but
thirty one loyal NATO allies.
I do agree that the methods being used are highly suspect and probably won't accomplish anything
You do completely misinterpret me!!
I'm saying that merely trying these threats on our loyal NATO allies is having direct negative consequences. That's a far cry from "won't accomplish anything."
Need an example? Back in early December, tRump crowed "Twenty-one trillion dollars will be the amount invested in the United States — or committed to invest — in one year."
That was his version of the agreements he had made in exchange for greatly reducing tariffs. His number is YUGELY inflated of course, perhaps by a factor of four, but still, it was something.
Now it has gone up in smoke. tRump broke his tariff agreements, so the related investment agreements are now null and void.
See what I mean about direct negative consequences?? That's a far cry from "won't accomplish anything."
UPDATE
I accept your ill-natured concession of defeat!!