This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
Anything that quotes the Daily Mail as its source is inherently unreliable because the DM is notoriously poor at fact checking even when it doesn't have an axe to grind.
When it come so stories that might stir up annoyance in its readers it has no credibility at all. They usually aren't actual reportage, just fairy stories designed to keep their readers entertained, circulation high, and often to serve the destructive political purposes of those who control the 'newspaper' or those they wish to please.
When it come so stories that might stir up annoyance in its readers it has no credibility at all. They usually aren't actual reportage, just fairy stories designed to keep their readers entertained, circulation high, and often to serve the destructive political purposes of those who control the 'newspaper' or those they wish to please.


