This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultPositive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

There was No world war ever, Are you agree ? 😎

I mean, if 12-15 nations fought a war then it's not a world war,

Same way, If Russian nuke Europe then Chinese won't give a fuck, or India won't care and African certainly not....there was NEVER and there will be NEVER a world war.

If Russia and USA nuke each other and both get obliterated and wiped out then Asian or African countries would not give it a damm fuck. ...and I wish it happens soon 😎
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
WWI and WWII both involved nations from every continent except Antarctica, so I guess they could qualify as "world" wars in that sense.
Sayana · 22-25, F
@ChipmunkErnie You can't say it a world war, most countries were out and some of them were colonized so they sent some troops involuntarily.

You are older than to me but I tell you 2 things, both are different though

1. World war can never be happen, ALL countries will not fight.

2. There is No positive and Negative effect, it's Allways good or bad effect.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@Sayana Whatever. It's called a "world war" because it was basically fought around most of the world. Argue with the historians if you don't like the term: "Approximately 32 to 33 nations fought in World War I, with many more involved through their empires and colonies, making it a truly global conflict." and "Approximately 70 to 75 nations fought in World War II, though a precise number is difficult to determine due to the complexity of shifting alliances, occupied territories, and changing definitions of "nation" during the conflict." As to no negative and no positive effect, what's the difference between those and "good" and "bad" effect -- they're synonyms.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@Sayana Uh, you missed the whole Asian and African bits in WWI and WWII? (Not to mention North Korean troops already in Ukraine.) And I'm more worried about China attacking people than the US, or Indian and Pakistan going nuclear. And even if part of the world sits out a nuclear war, they'll still be there when the fallout comes down.
Sayana · 22-25, F
@ChipmunkErnie North Korean " handful " troops in Ukraine can't make any difference. also they are forcefully being sent in the war. so, they won't fight with the spirit.

Also, If Pakistan nukes India, then India can survive, India is much bigger than the Japan...also in retaliation, India will nuke Pakistan and it will obliterate Pakistan from world map.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@Sayana Not too sure about how much survival there would be after a nuclear war, considering the difference between today's nukes and those small ones dropped in WWII, but if it makes you happy to think survival wouldn't be a problem, fine.
Sayana · 22-25, F
@ChipmunkErnie May be you are right, Today nukes are more powerful than to 1945's nukes but still India who has 1.5 billion people has been unlucky to have 2 nuclear enemies, China and Pakistan...and India is only country in the world who has 2 Neighboring enemies and both of them have nukes and missiles, So nuclear war is a BIG reality there ! ( sadly and unfortunately ) ⏰
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@Sayana We can only hope NO ONE is crazy enough to use nukes; but I'd say the same thing about chemical weapons and we know countries have used them not so long ago. :( We can only hope for some kind of sanity.