I see a lot of "Christians" Arguing the aren't bound by mosaic law and I just thought I'd refute that notion because that isn't bibilical at all.
"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil."
Matthew 5:17
These "Christians" Seem to believe that the Blood Sacrifice of Jesus somehow means they're no longer bound by those laws.
But jesus himself even said he didn't come to destroy the law but to fulfill it.
That means the law still stands according to JESUS HIMSELF.
Even if Paul taught something different he was in error.
There's nothing Scriptural about the notion that CHristians are not bound by Judaic and mosaic law- Jesus didn't destroy the law according to scripture.
For verily I say unto you, Till
heaven and earth pass, one jot or one
tittle shall in no wise pass from
the law, till all be fulfilled. Matthew 5:18
It's clear to any honest student of the bible that the real primary influence of christianity is paul. If Jesus had intended on starting a new religion He would have written a Creed. It's clear in scripture that if scripture is true ( which I doubt.) That jesus according to scripture lived breathed and DIED a JEW.
IF he IS resurrected ( HAHAHA? miracles are bullshit. it won't happen. ) he will come back as a JEW.
And it's Saul who taught that Jesus's blood sacrifice ultimately redeemed people from having to follow Mosaic law.
Matthew 5:19
Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least
commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be
called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but
whosoever shall do and teach them, the same
shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.