Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Many scientists believe in The Bibles account of creation. Here is a list

The following list of Christians who were fathers of various fields of modern science is enlarged from The Biblical Basis for Modern Science by Dr. Henry Morris. All of these men believed in the God of the Bible and divine creation.

- Antiseptic Surgery (Joseph Lister)
- Atomic Theory (John Dalton)
- Bacteriology (Louis Pasteur)
- Calculus (Isaac Newton)
- Celestial Mechanics (Johann Kepler)
- Chemistry (Robert Boyle and Antoine Lavoisier)
- Clinical Teaching (Herman Boerhaave)
- Comparative Anatomy (Georges Cuvier)
- Computer Science (Charles Babbage)
- Dimensional Analysis (Lord Rayleigh)
- Dynamics (Isaac Newton)
- Electrodynamics (James Clerk Maxwell)
- Electromagnetics (Michael Faraday and Andre Marie Ampere)
- Electronics (Ambrose Fleming)
- Energetics (William Thompson, Lord Kelvin)
- Entomology of Living Insects (Henri Fabre)
- Field Theory (Michael Faraday)
- Fluid Mechanics (George Stokes)
- Galactic Astronomy (William Hershel)
- Gas Dynamics (Robert Boyle)
- Genetics (Gregor Mendel)
- Glacial Geology (Louis Agassiz)
- Gynecology (James Simpson)
- Hydraulics (Leonardo da Vinci)
- Hydrography (Matthew Maury)
- Hydrostatics (Blaise Pascal)
- Ichthyology (Louis Agassiz)
- Isotopic Chemistry (William Ramsay)
- Model Analysis (Lord Raleigh)
- Natural History (John Ray)
- Neuropathology (John Abercrombie)
- Non-Euclidean Geometry (Bernard Riemann)
- Oceanography (Matthew Maury)
- Optical Mineralogy (David Brewster)
- Paleontology (John Woodard)
- Pathology (Rudolph Virchow)
- Physical Astronomy (Johann Kepler)
- Physiology (Albrecht von Haller)
- Plasma physics (Michael Faraday)
- Quantum Mechanics (Max Planck)
- Reversible Thermodynamics (James Joule)
- Statistical Thermodynamics (James Clerk Maxwell)
- Stratigraphy (Nicholas Steno)
- Taxonomy (Carolus Linnaeus)
- Thermodynamics (Lord Kelvin)
- Thermokinetics (Humphry Davy)
- Vertebrate Paleontology (Georges Cuvier)

The following are notable inventions and discoveries by scientists who believe in the God of the Bible and divine creation.

- Absolute temperature Scale (Lord Kelvin)
- Absorbable ligatures (Joseph Lister)
- Actuarial tables (Charles Babbage)
- Airplane (Orville and Wilbur Wright)
- Alpha and beta rays (Ernest Rutherford)
- Ampere (Andrew Marie Ampere)
- Anthrax (Robert Koch)
- Antiseptic surgery (Joseph Lister)
- Atomic weights (John Dalton)
- Bacteria and protozoa (A. Leeuwenhoek)
- Barometer (Blaise Pascal)
- Biogenesis law (Louis Pasteur)
- Bulldozer (R.G. LeTourneau)
- Bunsen burner (Michael Faraday)
- Calculating machine (Charles Babbage)
- Chloroform (James Simpson)
- Classification system (Carolus Linnaeus)
- Clinical teaching (Herman Boerhaave)
- Dalton’s law (John Dalton)
- Diode valve (Ambrose Fleming)
- Double stars (William Hershel)
- Electric battery (Alessandro Volta)
- Electric motor (Joseph Henry)
- Electric Wheel (R.G. LeTourneau)
- Electromagnetic Fields (Michael Faraday)
- Electrons and isotopes (J.J. Thomson)
- Ephemeris tables (Johann Kepler)
- Fermentation control (Louis Pasteur)
- Fraunhofer lines (Joseph von Fraunhofer)
- Galvanometer (Joseph Henry)
- Global Star Catalog (John Hershel)
- Hadley’s principle (George Hadley)
- Inert gases (William Ramsay)
- Kaleidoscope (David Brewster)
- Kelvin (Lord Kelvin)
- Koch’s postulates (Robert Koch)
- Law of gravity (Isaac Newton)
- Legionella (Carl Fliermans)
- Light microscope (Joseph Jackson Lister)
- Logarithms (John Napier)
- Magnetic Resonance Imagining (MRI) (Raymond Damadian)
- Maxwell’s equations (James Clerk Maxwell)
- Mechanical Reaper (Cyrus McCormick)
- Milne model (Edward Arthur Milne)
- Mine safety lamp (Humphry Davy)
- Mobile offshore oil platform - Napier’s bones (John Napier)
- Nitrous acid formulation (Isaac Milner)
- Pasteurization (Louis Pasteur)
- Petroleum distillation (Benjamin Silliman)
- Rabies (Louis Pasteur)
- Radio telegraph (Guglielmo Marconi)
- Radon (Ernest Rutherford)
- Rayleigh scattering (Lord Rayleigh)
- Red blood cells shape and function (J.J. Lister)
- Reflecting telescope (Isaac Newton)
- Restriction enzymes (Werner Arber)
- Right-hand rule (John Ambrose Fleming)
- Rutherford model of the atom (Ernest Rutherford)
- Scientific method (Francis Bacon)
- Self-induction (Joseph Henry)
- Telegraph (Samuel Morse)
- Thermionic valve (Ambrose Fleming)
- Transatlantic cable (Lord Kelvin)
- Tritium (Ernest Rutherford)
- Tuberculosis (Robert Koch)
- Uranus (William Herschel)
- Vaccination and immunization (Louis Pasteur)

The founders of modern science saw the handiwork of God in the universe.

Johannes Kepler, one of the fathers of modern astronomy and the discoverer of the laws of planetary motion: “I was merely thinking God’s thoughts after him. Since we astronomers are priests of the highest God in regard to the book of nature, it benefits us to be thoughtful, not of the glory of our minds, but rather, above all else, of the glory of God.”

Francis Bacon, father of the scientific method of inquiry: “It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men’s minds about to religion; for while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to Providence and Deity” (Of Atheism)

Blaise Pascal, inventor of the barometer and revolutionary thinker in the field of mathematics: “Faith tells us what the senses cannot, but it is not contrary to their findings. It simply transcends, without contradicting them.”

Isaac Newton, discoverer of the law of gravity: “This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being. ... Atheism is so senseless. When I look at the solar system, I see the earth at the right distance from the sun to receive the proper amounts of heat and light. This did not happen by chance” (Principia).

Robert Boyle, the father of modern chemistry: “The vastness, beauty, orderliness, of the heavenly bodies, the excellent structure of animals and plants; and the other phenomena of nature justly induce an intelligent and unprejudiced observer to conclude a supremely powerful, just, and good author” (Works, vol. IV, p. 25).

Michael Faraday, one of the fathers of modern physics: “... the Christian who is taught of God ... finds his guide in the Word of God ... and looks for no assurance beyond what the Word can give Him. ... The Christian religion is a revelation, and that revelation is the Word of God ... No revival and no temporal teaching comes between it and him. He who is taught of the Holy Spirit needs no crowd and no revival to teach him; if he stand alone he is fully taught” (Selected Exhortations Delivered to Various Churches of Christ by the Late Michael Faraday, Dundee: John Leng and Co., 1910).

Faraday said, “The Creator governs his material works by definite laws resulting from the forces impressed on matter,” and it was this presupposition and Faraday’s desire to find these laws that directed his research. Far from limiting or hindering his scientific inquiry, Faraday’s faith in God and the Bible drove his research. “He sought the unifying laws relating the forces of the world, and was highly successful in respect of electricity, magnetism, and light” (I.H. Hutchinson, “Michael Faraday: Scientist and Nonconformist”).

James Clerk Maxwell, another of the fathers of modern physics, said, “I believe, with the Westminster Divines and their predecessors ad Infinitum, that ‘Man's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him for ever’” (Lewis Campbell and William Garnet, The life of James Clerk Maxwell, 1882). In his final illness, Maxwell confirmed “his firm and undoubting faith in the Incarnation and all its results; in the full sufficiency of the Atonement; in the work of the Holy Spirit. He had gauged and fathomed all the schemes and systems of philosophy, and had found them utterly empty and unsatisfying--‘unworkable’ was his own word about them--and he turned with simple faith to the Gospel of the Saviour” (Ibid.).

There are still thousands of scientists who disagree with the Darwinian view of evolution. Among these are Christian “young earth” creationists, Christian “old earth” creationists, non-Christian theistic evolutionists, and those who believe in an undefined intelligent designer.

In 1979, Science Digest reported that “scientists who utterly reject evolution may be one of our fastest-growing controversial minorities,” and stated that, “Many of the scientists supporting this position hold impressive credentials in science” (Larry Hatfield, “Educators Against Darwin,” Science Digest Special, Winter 1979, pp. 94-96).

According to recent research, there are an estimated 113,000 Darwin skeptic scientists and academics in the United States alone (Neil Gross and Solon Simmons, How Religious Are America’s College and University Professors?, Working paper Harvard University, Oct. 5, 2006).

In the American public at large, a Gallup poll in 2012 found that 46% are young-earth creationists and 32% adhere to some form of God-guided or theistic evolution, while only 15% adhere to Darwinian naturalistic evolution. Among those with post graduate degrees, 25% believe in young-earth creation, 29% hold to naturalistic evolution, and 42% hold to some sort of theistic evolution.

A 2006 survey in Israel by the Samuel Neaman Institute found that 59% of the Jewish population believe that man was created by God as described in the Torah, which is the first five books of the Hebrew Scripture. By the finding of this survey, only 28% of Israelis believe in evolution.

Jewish organizations that hold to creation include the National Conference of Synagogue Youth and the Association of Orthodox Jewish Scientists. Jewish scientists with Ph.D.s who hold to creation include Morris Goldman, parasitologist; Edward Simon, professor of biology at Purdue University; Nathan Aviezer, physics; Lee Spetner, Ph.D. from MIT and former biophysicist at Johns Hopkins University; Gerald Schroeder, Ph.D. from MIT; Yaacov Hanoka, Ph.D. in solid state physics; Allan Sandage, Ph.D. from Cal Tech; and Mortimer Adler, editor of Great Books of the Western World and considered by many to be “one of the greatest thinkers in history.”

Many other Jewish Ph.D.s are Darwin doubters. These include Paul Ehrlich, Nobel Laureate; Ernst Chain, one of the principal discoverers of antibiotics; Arno Penzias, astrophysicist Nobel Laureate; and David Berlinski, American educator and author.

Dr. Jerry Bergman has compiled a list of 3,000 “Darwin Skeptics,” including about a dozen Nobel Prize winners. See www.rae.org/pdf/darwinskeptics.pdf

Bergman has a private list of about 1,000 names of persons who do not want their names on a public list “because of real concerns over possible retaliation or harm to their careers.”

Bergman says, “I estimate that, if I had the time and resources, I could easily complete a list of over 10,000 names” (“Darwin Skeptics: A Select List of Science Academics, Scientists, and Scholars Who Are Skeptical of Darwinism,” Aug. 24, 2014).

This is a result of the Darwinists who act like howler monkeys and Nazi SS troopers to try to stomp out every vestige of “creationism” from the field of science.

The Discovery Institute has published “A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism” -- www.discovery.org. On the front page is the following quotation from David Berlinski, Ph.D., Philosophy, Princeton University: “Darwin’s theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large, almost completely useless, and the object of superstitious awe.”

As of April 2014, the list had been signed by about 840 scientists who agree with the following statement:

“We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”

Of course, even if NO scientist disputed evolution, this does not mean it is correct. The Bible says, “Let God be true, but every man a liar” (Romans 3:4); and Jesus said, “I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes” (Matthew 11:25).

But it is a fact that thousands of men and women with higher degrees reject evolution.

The Creation Research Society membership consists of more than 600 men and women who hold advanced degrees and are committed to biblical creationism.

The Korea Association of Creation Research membership includes 450 scientists, 150 of them with Ph.D.s. The President of KACR is Young-Gil Kim, Ph.D. in material science and engineering. For 15 years he was a professor with the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. He is the inventor of important high-tech alloys. In 1995, he founded Handong Global University with the objective of integrating biotechnology and mechatronics.

There is a growing creationism and intelligent design movement in Brazil and elsewhere.

Our book Scientists Who Believe the Bible contains the testimonies of 91 scientists, most of whom have earned doctorates, who believe in a literal six-day creation. It is available as a free eBook and also in a print edition from www.wayoflife.org.


- www.wayoflife.org
______________________


Sharing Policy: Much of our material is available for free, such as the hundreds of articles at the Way of Life web site. Other items we sell to help fund our expensive literature and foreign church planting ministries. Way of Life's content falls into two categories: sharable and non-sharable. Things that we encourage you to share include the audio sermons, O Timothy magazine, FBIS articles, and the free eVideos and free eBooks. You are welcome to make copies of these at your own expense and share them with friends and family. You may also post parts of reports and/or entire reports to websites, blogs, etc as long as you give proper credit (citation). A link to the original report is very much appreciated as the reports are frequently updated and/or expanded. Things we do not want copied and distributed are "Store" items like the Fundamental Baptist Digital Library, print editions of our books, electronic editions of the books that we sell, the videos that we sell, etc. The items have taken years to produce at enormous expense in time and money, and we use the income from sales to help fund the ministry. We trust that your Christian honesty will preserve the integrity of this policy. "For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward" (1 Timothy 5:18). Questions? support@wayoflife.org

Goal:Distributed by Way of Life Literature Inc., the Fundamental Baptist Information Service is an e-mail posting for Bible-believing Christians. Established in 1974, Way of Life Literature is a fundamental Baptist preaching and publishing ministry based in Bethel Baptist Church, London, Ontario, of which Wilbert Unger is the founding Pastor. Brother Cloud lives in South Asia where he has been a church planting missionary since 1979. Our primary goal with the FBIS is to provide material to assist preachers in the edification and protection of the churches.

Offering: Offerings are welcome if you care to make one. If you have been helped and/or blessed by our material offerings can be mailed or made online with with Visa, Mastercard, Discover, or Paypal. For information see: www.wayoflife.org/about/makeanoffering.html.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
redredred · M
Anybody born in the last forty years? BTW, Evolution is demonstrated every day in the field of genetics. It is no more subject to doubt than gravity. Endogenous Retro Viruses demonstrate beyond any realistic doubt that humans and chimps had a common ancestor that was neither human nor chimp.

You’re desperately grasping at a silly superstition nor different in any significant way from astrology.
Roadsterrider · 56-60, M
@redredred Is evolution or adaptation demonstrated in genetics, virus strains mutate and adapt but they don't turn into a different creature or species. In 5000 years of written history, there isn't any mention of one thing turning into another, there are a number of current scientists that disagree with scientific methods and theories currently held by the scientific community at large. What do we do when one archaeologist disagrees with another archaeologist? We should question different ideas, but to assume them incorrect because they don't follow along with the current theory means nothing new will be proven. Following that logic, we would still have mental health professionals using icepicks to perform lobotomies and doctors using vibrators on women to prevent hysterics. Science is not infallible.
Carazaa · F
@redredred Yes this guy Anders Gardeborn is one of many who will be speaking at the Genesis world conference in October and who wrote this article on genetic code in the Bible, and is a creationist.
https://www.gardeborn.se/onewebmedia/Artiklar2/Koder/The%20Ultimate%20Apolegetics-work%20in%20progress.pdf
graphite · 61-69, M
@Roadsterrider In the 1950s, some doctors thought it was a great idea to put newborn, premature babies in incubators. Blinded them for life. Oops. Guess the science wasn't as settled as they thought.
Roadsterrider · 56-60, M
@graphite There have been a number of medical procedures that are hard to swallow that were accepted practices. Mercury in vaccines, the incubators, icepick lobotomies, electroshock therapy. I question anything that doesn't make sense, when a creation scientist comes up with a question that "settled science" can't answer, how can you decide which one is correct without questioning both? "I have my evolution blinders on, I won't entertain any idea that doesn't involve millions of years and monkeys."
redredred · M
@Roadsterrider not monkeys, apes. The ape category include Homo sapiens. If you understood genetic science you would understand that there is incontrovertible proof that chimps and humans have a common ancestor species that was neither chimp nor human and certainly not a monkey.
Roadsterrider · 56-60, M
@redredred Scientists question the Cambrian explosion, how did all the creatures show up in the Cambrian era with nothing leading to it in older layers? This video has a few zingers in it like Berlinski talking about a turtle on a fence post and comparing his opinion on intelligent design like his relationship with his ex wives, keep it distant. David Berlinski is a philosopher and mathematician, Gerlernter is a professor of computer science at Yale, Stephen Meyer is a former geophysicist and college professor, and now directs Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture in Seattle. Three highly educated men in varying disciplines with Gerlernter changing his opinion on evolution. It is an interesting video to me. Are these men ignorant for thinking there might be some sort of intelligent design?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noj4phMT9OE&t=1456s
redredred · M
@Roadsterrider So, not a life scientist among them. Got it.
My daughter is a geneticist. The modern science of genetics is underpinned by the remarkably well documented evolution of species. The results of the human genome project demonstrate conclusively that humans and chimps had a common ancestor.
Carazaa · F
@redredred

Don't assume they have common ancestors because their genes have similarities. That's like saying my table has screws and my bookshelf has the same screws, so my bookshelf and my table are related. Nonsense, they both have the same maker using the same screws! Read your Bible and you will not jump to the wrong conclusions.
Carazaa · F
@Roadsterrider Thank you 🙏
redredred · M
@Carazaa it has nothing to do with gene similarity. It has to do with endogenous retro viruses that clearly mark the genome (not the genes) of each species with incontrovertible evidence of common ancestry.

I recognize you have no way to ever understand that but see if you can find someone to explain it to you.
Carazaa · F
@redredred Like what incontrovertible evidence are you talking about?
redredred · M
@Carazaa there is a class of viruses called endogenous retro viruses. These leave an inheritable mark on the genome of the individual. If your ancestor of 300,000 years ago contracted one of these viruses there is an identical marker in the exact same spot on your genome. The genome is vast there are million of potential spots on the genome where this marker could appear.

This is a tool geneticists use to establish descent and every human who has ever lived has a common set to the set every chimpanzee that has ever lived has. This is as distinct as fingerprints and to deny it is comparable to denying fingerprints.

A similar effect is seen in horses and donkeys, dogs and wolves and other similar species. Evolution is not seriously questioned by geneticists. You’re questioning something as obvious as blood type.
Carazaa · F
@redredred 300000 years ago? Hogwash! If you start out with a lie you will never get to the truth! When Adam sinned God marked all creation. The marker could have been put there by God like I said! When God said that he cursed every living thing, he did.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Carazaa · F
@redredred If this is you being gentle, maybe you are capable of the worst sin, murder. But even so Jesus will forgive if you follow him, and he will even answer your prayers too if you follow him 🙂
@redredred I don't care who she is she's not smarter than God. Maybe she hasn't read the true account of creation in the Bible.

When you compare the different races of mankind you will find that under the different skin colors we are all ONE MANKIND. We all descended from one man and one woman. Therefore, racism and nationalism have no scientific basis because we are all ONE. The rich, the poor, the beautiful and those not so beautiful, the tall, the short, the blue eyed blondes, the dark eyed blacks etc. etc. are all brothers and sisters.

The Bible confirms this in the book of ACTS 17:26 where it states “And He made out of one man, every nation of men to dwell on the entire surface of the earth, and He decreed the appointed times and set the limits where men would dwell.” And in Genesis 3:20, it says “After this, Adam named his wife Eve (meaning ‘living one’) because she was to become the mother of everyone living.”
redredred · M
@LadyGrace your fairy tale book is riddled with factual errors and it proves nothing. We are not descendent from a single couple, if we were the accumulation of dangerous mutations from generations of inbreeding would leave us unable to survive. Your silly fairy tale book actually provides two Eve origin stories so even deluded believers have to accept one and recognize the other as an error.
@redredred yada yada yada that's what you always say you can never prove it. Haha
redredred · M
@LadyGrace I don’t have to prove anything. I’m not the one asserting that magical, invisible forces are directing everything, performing miracles, walking on water and rising from the dead. Care to provide even traffic-court level proof for any of those bullshit stories?