Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Am Christian (roman Catholic)

An Appeal to Our Fellow Catholics (Regarding US Presidential Election 2016)

Published in National Review Online on March 7, 2016

http://eppc.org/publications/an-appeal-to-our-fellow-catholics/

In recent decades, the Republican party has been a vehicle — imperfect, like all human institutions, but serviceable — for promoting causes at the center of Catholic social concern in the United States: (1) providing legal protection for unborn children, the physically disabled and cognitively handicapped, the frail elderly, and other victims of what Saint John Paul II branded “the culture of death”; (2) defending religious freedom in the face of unprecedented assaults by officials at every level of government who have made themselves the enemies of conscience; (3) rebuilding our marriage culture, ba<x>sed on a sound understanding of marriage as the conjugal union of husband and wife; and (4) re-establishing constitutional and limited government, according to the core Catholic social-ethical principle of subsidiarity. There have been frustrations along the way, to be sure; no political party perfectly embodies Catholic social doctrine. But there have also been successes, and at the beginning of the current presidential electoral cycle, it seemed possible that further progress in defending and advancing these noble causes was possible through the instrument of the Republican party.

That possibility is now in grave danger. And so are those causes.

Donald Trump is manifestly unfit to be president of the United States. His campaign has already driven our politics down to new levels of vulgarity. His appeals to racial and ethnic fears and prejudice are offensive to any genuinely Catholic sensibility. He promised to order U.S. military personnel to torture terrorist suspects and to kill terrorists’ families — actions condemned by the Church and policies that would bring shame upon our country. And there is nothing in his campaign or his previous record that gives us grounds for confidence that he genuinely shares our commitments to the right to life, to religious freedom and the rights of conscience, to rebuilding the marriage culture, or to subsidiarity and the principle of limited constitutional government.

We understand that many good people, including Catholics, have been attracted to the Trump campaign because the candidate speaks to issues of legitimate and genuine concern: wage stagnation, grossly incompetent governance, profligate governmental spending, the breakdown of immigration law, inept foreign policy, stifling “political correctness” — for starters. There are indeed many reasons to be concerned about the future of our country, and to be angry at political leaders and other elites. We urge our fellow Catholics and all our fellow citizens to consider, however, that there are candidates for the Republican nomination who are far more likely than Mr. Trump to address these concerns, and who do not exhibit his vulgarity, oafishness, shocking ignorance, and — we do not hesitate to use the word — demagoguery.

Mr. Trump’s record and his campaign show us no promise of greatness; they promise only the further degradation of our politics and our culture. We urge our fellow Catholics and all our fellow citizens to reject his candidacy for the Republican presidential nomination by supporting a genuinely reformist candidate.

Robert P. George
McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence
Princeton University

George Weigel
Distinguished Senior Fellow and William E. Simon Chair in Catholic Studies
Ethics and Public Policy Center

and

Ryan T. Anderson
William E. Simon Senior Research Fellow
The Heritage Foundation

Stephen M. Barr
University of Delaware

Francis J. Beckwith
Professor of Philosophy and Church–State Studies
Baylor University

Mary Ellen Bork
Ethics and Public Policy Center Board

Gerard V. Bradley
Professor of Law
University of Notre Dame

Don J. Briel
John Henry Newman Chair of Liberal Arts
University of Mary

Brian Burch
President, CatholicVote.org.

James C. Capretta
Senior Fellow, Ethics and Public Policy Center

Joseph Cella
Founder, National Catholic Prayer Breakfast

Grazie Pozo Christie, M.D.
The Catholic Association

Ann Corkery
Founder, Catholic Voices USA

Neil Corkery
Sudan Relief Fund

David Paul Deavel
Interim Editor, Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture

Mary Eberstadt
Senior Fellow, Ethics and Public Policy Center

Eduardo Echeverria
Professor of Philosophy and Systematic Theology
Sacred Heart Major Seminary

Thomas F. Farr
Director, Religious Freedom Project
Georgetown University

Matthew J. Franck
Director, William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution, Witherspoon Institute

Anna Halpine
Founder, World Youth Alliance

Mary Rice Hasson
Director, Catholic Women’s Forum, Ethics and Public Policy Center

Stephen J. Heaney
Associate Professor of Philosophy
University of St. Thomas

John P. Hittinger
Pope John Paul II Forum, Center for Thomistic Studies
University of St. Thomas

Elizabeth M. Kelly
Managing Editor, Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture

Rachel Lu
Senior Contributor, The Federalist

Bruce D. Marshall
Lehman Professor of Christian Doctrine
Perkins School of Theology
Southern Methodist University

Robert T. Miller
Professor of Law and F. Arnold Daum Fellow in Corporate Law
University of Iowa College of Law

Kate O’Beirne
Former Washington Editor, National Review

C. C. Pecknold
The Catholic University of America

Robert Royal
Faith and Reason Institute

Deborah Savage
Professor of Philosophy and Theology
University of St. Thomas

Timothy Samuel Shah
Religious Freedom Project
Georgetown University

Nina Shea
Director, Center for Religious Freedom
Hudson Institute

Hilary Towers
Developmental psychologist and author

David R. Upham
Associate Professor of Politics
University of Dallas

Edward Whelan
Ethics and Public Policy Center

Stephen P. White
Fellow, Ethics and Public Policy Center

Titles and affiliations of each individual are provided for identification purposes only. The views expressed are those of the individual signatories and do not necessarily represent the views of any organization or entity.



George Weigel is Distinguished Senior Fellow of Washington, D.C.’s Ethics and Public Policy Center, where he holds the William E. Simon Chair in Catholic Studies. Robert P. George holds Princeton University’s McCormick Chair in Jurisprudence and is the founding director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. He also serves as vice chairman of EPPC’s board of directors.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
XIXMCMLI
Religion should keep it's ass out of politics.
Religious people are not second-class citizens.
XIXMCMLI
No one is saying that they are, unless you would like to play the persecution card now? Religious people are not second class citizens and a religion is not a branch of politics, so keep your damned religion out of politics.
MrSquishy
Religious people are citizens like any others, no different, no second class, just equal in rights. They cannot pretend to impose their religious principles on others.
XIXMCMLI
Sadly they will never stop trying both in politics and education two fields that religion would love to control, If the OP wishes to live under a theocrazy (deliberate spelling) then he has a host of countries to choose from even one that is 100% Roman Catholic.
MrSquishy
Please don't think the opinion of the gentleman above is representative of all Catholics or all religious people for that matter. Many of us do understand that separation of state and church protects us and everyone else's freedom of belief.
XIXMCMLI
Yes I appreciate that and I also appreciate that you as a RC are willing to point that out to him. What I say here I would say against any religion trying to gain a political majority on the grounds of religion, as an atheist I would also be against atheists attempting to do the same thing, both a person's religion and their vote are personal and there is no need to mix the two.
MrSquishy
The basic principles of democracy (and human rights) is that every opinion is worthy of respect. I think the diversity of creeds or absence of creeds, is a benefit to us all. We can get perspective on our own beliefs, it's healthy. If we all thought the same it would soon turn into pissing contest and in no time we would be taking strange women to the bonfire simply because they speak to their cats.
XIXMCMLI
Believe me I would have a lot more respect for believers if there were more like you, you appear to have both religion and common sense, it is not common to find both together.
MrSquishy
There are plenty of people like us Christians, atheists, and others, but we rarely burn flags or attack abortion clinics so we don't make it as often in the headlines.
XIXMCMLI
Very true, I am having a problem and it is slightly related to what you say here, my problem is with Islam, like christians not hitting the headlines the vast majority of muslims are not out killing others yet the silence from the vast majority is deafening and that can be seen as tacit support by non muslins and is actually taken to be support by the daesh, that is why I find it so refreshing to find someone like yourself who is willing to stand up against a fellow believer when you know what they are doing is wrong. It will be interesting to see how many other believers are willing to do that or perhaps they will be like the majority of muslims.
MrSquishy
I have met and befriended many muslims who believe that faith is a personal choice, and that respecting someone elses beliefs is important. I think nowadays Muslims are given such bad press in general that many are on the defensive and feel insecure. This make them less likely to speak out agains other people sharing their faith.
Same with many other beliefs, being caught between hardline extremists and criticism of others isn't always conducive to speaking out.
I think medias tend also to give far more air time to the louder voices...that doesn't help moderate and decent people to make head lines.
XIXMCMLI
I agree with you in regards to the bad press but if they were to speak out against the bastards that are hijacking (IF that is the case?) then the press coverage would change as would the opinion of a great number of non muslims. I am sure that over one billion have a louder voice than the few tens of thousands (again IF that is the case) who are committing these atrocities and the really crazy thing is that the vast majority of the atrocities are committed against their fellow muslims.
MrSquishy
I understand what you say, but I believe it is not right to expect that. Why make them responsible for the actions of extremists?
Do we ask Christians to speak out against extremist to attack abortion centres? Do we ask atheists to protest against persecutions against religions?
I think that expecting moderate Muslims to stand out to extremists singles them out. Everyone who cares for democracy should stand out to extremists, regardless of their faith or origin.
XIXMCMLI
No you do not ask them to speak out against that but never the less it is sad that so few do and lets face it christianity is not getting the bad press because of the actions of a few individuals that islam is getting over the deaths of many thousands of people, all the more reason that muslims should be willing to stand up for what is right. It is a muslim problem and they are doing NOTHING to fix it. I am not asking for individuals to speak out, I am asking for islam to speak out to unanimously condemn these acts of violence for until they do they cannot expect non muslims to treat then any other way than they are being treated now. I did not expect you to play the persecution card, what persecutions are you speaking of?
XIXMCMLI
I must leave now but I do hope that we can continue this discussion when I return.
MrSquishy
Islam is not a coherent entity, it is almost a billon people. from Africa to Asia, with strong presence in Europe. Several streams of beliefs, mixed with regional cultural variations. I believe it is a common mistake to see islam as one, it is varied and rich with complexities.
It would be very difficult to have a unanimous condemnation.
However, there are Muslim Kurds fighting Isis in Syria and Irak and they give women a preominent place in their troups.
Don't you think they take a very positive and clear stance against extremists?
I do think we have in the west a very caricatural view of the Muslim world and our medias tend to over simplify the situation. There are muslim democrats, there are muslim philosophers and writers, there is a very diverse practice of the muslim faith.
XIXMCMLI
Quite honestly I do not see a great deal of difference, the Kurds have wanted a homeland for centuries, it id all about land an control of people, it appears that they are little better than the daesh, rather like the kettle calling the pot black.
-
The images show the severed heads of captured militants. The beheadings happened on Jan. 30, during a fierce battle to drive ISIS out of the oil-rich city of Kirkuk.

The Kurds say that at the time, peshmerga fighters, Kurdish volunteers, Shi’ite militia and local tribes were all fighting ISIS.

“In this confusing atmosphere … obviously it is very difficult to identify who has been responsible, but still we are looking into this matter,” Kurdish Regional government spokesperson Safeen Dizayi told CTV News.

He said there is “no justification to behave in such a way and to treat dead corpses of ISIS or whomever in such a manner.”

As coalition forces wage war against ISIS overseas, the alleged atrocities are an uncomfortable prospect for Western allies.

Since Canada is supporting the Kurds in what the government calls a training and advisory capacity, the Opposition and Amnesty International say it has an obligation to participate in the investigation.

“There is certainly ample reason to be concerned that this amounts to war crimes,” Amnesty International’s Alex Neve told CTV News.

Canadian Special Forces are based in Erbil, which is located 88 kilometres from where the killings occurred.

CTV News showed the gruesome photographs to Canada’s Department of National Defence.
BeingConsidered
I second that XIX
BeingConsidered
A very fair point XIX