Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

How someone feels is their choice, not mine.

I'm not designed to care how you feel about what I think. It's not my job to control your feelings. By the way you seem to be neglectful of practicing controlling your own. That's not a dunk. Just an observation.

Sometimes you gotta listen to someone's words as if you were hearing them for the first time to actually understand the meaning behind them.

However when we feel love for others as most of us will at least in the warmer times and circumstances we do obligate ourselves to do what I call define my parameter.

My first one is that I acknowledge that no more than you can hear or see through my eyes and ears am I going to be likely to see through yours as well as you can. Two perceptions never align perfectly even when they're in agreement.

If you want to correct me I am willing to hear you make your case and take time later in respite while I'm alone to examine all I hear. It's unneeded or worse, unwise for you to demand my defend my position immediately upon hearing your complaints. I will not at any point now or in the future be held accountable for things I have no control over.

I will not be bullied into apologizing for being who I am or for speaking in what are observable facts in any given moment. If you can't manage your emotions sufficiently, hear accurately, see my actions factually or exercise factual consistent recall I am not someone who cares to rectify your disabilities or ruminate about that.

Asking or telling me about feelings is a waste of time for either of us since we are not a married couple and in my observation feelings displayed are at times deliberately at others unintentionally misleading. And quite frankly, other than that both of us probably resent someone else manipulating our feelings their concern about ours can be just as false and again life has taught me, fleeting. Besides this my feelings are really none of your business unless you're my souse, my therapist or my mom.

I'll thank you not to channel any of those.

I don't see the point in entertaining grudges, plotting revenge or mud wrestling since those things are for the weak. All doings affect future decisions and it's always important to me to limit any future knows. So is patience. I never slammed a phone, hung up without saying goodbye, or found it useful to gossip or give credence to same.

Arguments are stupid and unnecessary 98% of the time. If we are not arguing and you revisit closed communicative controversies do not think that you can elicit anything but a stern reminder of the above. If you pile adhominem attacks on top of that, I'll meet your ante and with poise and skill, raise the stakes to utterly collapse your self esteem. This does not negate my love for you but to teach you the lesson not to tamper with mine. You may have a serious problem of some sort but I'm no doctor. As a non doctor don't expect my tools to have the surgical precision of a Freudian expert.

The next time we meet expect a smile, a pleasant demeanor, and an aversion to digging in old dirt. Dirty looks or snide comments will only amuse me. If you make empty threats I will advice you not. When you say they are not but promises expect my full attention and future repercussions you only brought upon yourself.

Thanks. Have a wonderous day. And don't forget. Loving someone means you have patience with them but it never means we aren't obligated to ignore their dangerous flaws silently and not revile or rebuke them forever.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SteelHands · 61-69, M
@pripyatamusementpark That's recommended especially for those that might by lack of self mastery or means cause unintended permanent damages to this apparent funny farm of this corner of the galaxy, and they with the means to take up a better goal than observe and learn or disentangle the effects from the causes of these dissenblements. Forgive my protracted reply but I think you might find it amusing.

It's easy to assume that each is seeking to undertake a challenge or that the will to power is the driving force. That is, our easiest and only natural structure to project the understandings onto others. The early philosophers did a great job. They had fewer examples to cite, and no precedents to follow. This is why people seem so naked in their baffling behavior.

Without sufficient time to contemplate the possibility of the existence of some hobbitual monsters of an equal or greater nature within the self they are left with acceptance or denial. They talk acceptance but don't, they deny denial then deny they do.

It isn't surprising then that they're their own worst problem while pointing fingers in all the wrong directions. While making themselves into the very monsters adding veracity to the formerly wrongful claims.

The oroboros of their head-assiness.

 
Post Comment