I had a conversation with someone close to me about "separating art from the artist"…

He had an interesting perspective.

He was saying that even if he had been convinced that Michael Jackson was guilty of wrongdoing, enjoying his music after his death would not be the same as listening while he was still alive—none of the money spent now would be contributing to his personal comfort.

"So you don’t have to boycott Wagner, "he continued, "even though he was said to be a miserable human being. Nothing you spend to see or listen to his music performed is going into his pockets now."

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

dragonfly46 · F

So interesting you brought this question to light, I was just thinking about this.
Do we judge them for being human, for making taboo mistakes? ( I struggle here with the word "mistake" not sure what word to use here.)
Do we see their work in new eyes when their transgressions see the light of day?
Would their work be the same if they were better humans?
I don't know the answers.
I do still love Picasso although he was a terrible human.
I will watch Annie Hall though I detest Woody Allen.
Your thoughts, BB?