This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
yrger · 80-89, M
@DocSavage
You say:
I have also repeatedly asked you what evidence lead you to such a conclusion.
I tell you:
We must first work together to agree on a mutually defined concept of evidence, otherwise we put ourselves in an absurd situation of talking past each other.
As you have the faculties of reason and intelligence, what do you say, doesn't the regular order of nature implicate the existence of God as the creator and operator of nature? -Yrger
As I have repeatedly stated , I find nothing in nature to suggest or support the existence of such a being. I have also repeatedly asked you what evidence lead you to such a conclusion. You refuse to answer.
You say:
I have also repeatedly asked you what evidence lead you to such a conclusion.
I tell you:
We must first work together to agree on a mutually defined concept of evidence, otherwise we put ourselves in an absurd situation of talking past each other.
As you have the faculties of reason and intelligence, what do you say, doesn't the regular order of nature implicate the existence of God as the creator and operator of nature? -Yrger
As I have repeatedly stated , I find nothing in nature to suggest or support the existence of such a being. I have also repeatedly asked you what evidence lead you to such a conclusion. You refuse to answer.