This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DocSavage · M
Why bother defining evidence. You’ll only “ultimate” back to your god. So it’s pointless. Except for one detail you can not prove.
You insist that god is not subject to your own rule of something coming from nothing. The buck stops with god.
But there is one characteristic which is not mandatory. And that is god’s immortality. Your god does not need to be permanent. Once creation has begun, the process started, god himself is no longer needed.
If he started evolution, the random mutation can go in any direction without guidance. Same with the rest of the universe. Your god, was probably killed at the Big Bang and the universe grew from there.
So, rather than argue ultimate origins. How about showing us your god is still operating and in control. That includes creating chicken, babies , and roses. All of which are self replicating on their own.
You insist that god is not subject to your own rule of something coming from nothing. The buck stops with god.
But there is one characteristic which is not mandatory. And that is god’s immortality. Your god does not need to be permanent. Once creation has begun, the process started, god himself is no longer needed.
If he started evolution, the random mutation can go in any direction without guidance. Same with the rest of the universe. Your god, was probably killed at the Big Bang and the universe grew from there.
So, rather than argue ultimate origins. How about showing us your god is still operating and in control. That includes creating chicken, babies , and roses. All of which are self replicating on their own.