The miracle of God creating the first chicken with eggs inside it

Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

From my own prolonged thinking, I concluded that God miraculously created the first chicken with eggs already inside it.

What about you atheists, which came first, the chicken or the egg?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

yrger · 80-89, M

@DocSavage

You use plenty of words but all of them are useless, still you foolishly believe that with many vacuous words what is useless to explain evolution, you will make it a fact.

Okay, tell me, does evolution lead to the production of a better species all the time?

And does the previous inferior species die out?

For evolutionists, random mutation leads to natural selection.

There, you guys are invoking nature, and I tell it is the God of nature that creates nature and operates nature.

So, there is no way you fake scientists can escape from God.

[quote]DocSavage · M

@yrger

"You are invoking the socalled theory of evolution, it is a dubious science -Yrger."

I know I’m going to regret this. Evolution, is one of ( if not the most - [i]ipse dixit[/i]) supported theory there is. Not only is there mountains of fossil evidence ([i]gratuitous utterance[/i]). It has been observed both in nature and in laboratory conditions.
Science doesn’t like to call anything absolute. But evolution is the closest you will get to a scientific fact ([i]exaggeration[/i]).
So, since you set it out there , what problem do you have against evolution ([i]you have a problem with dreaming up nonsensical explanation, in order to not face the God creator and operator of everything including me and you[/i]).
That makes it a “dubious science “ ? [b][i](Yes yes yes yes yes . . . )[/i][/b][/quote]

DocSavage · M

[@yrger/bonehead
Evolutionists ?
Let’s take this a step at a time.
Does mutation happen - yes
Is there such a thing as natural selection - yes
Does either one, depend on god ? - [b]Fuck no[/b]
Which is why I never mentioned one. I simply asked what you have against the theory. As I said, it has been observed, not only through fossil remains. But in nature and in laboratories. No one argues mutation, no one argues natural selection. Both are pretty well understood.
The science is very straight forward. What exactly is your doubt regarding lt ? Limit yourself to direct answers.

DocSavage · M

[@yrger[c=009E4F]/bonehead[/c]
In your last thread, it turned out that my view of god, is pretty much the same way described in Buddhism . Man made.
So far, according to you, I started out an Atheist, then you decided I was a Christian, then an Atheist again, then a Buddhist, and now an evolutionist.
And what are you ?

A cry baby.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@yrger [quote]the production of a better species all the time?

[/quote]Better at what?

What criterion are you using for 'better'?

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@yrger [quote]does the previous inferior species die out?[/quote]

In what way 'inferior'?

Umm... do you think that one species 'turns into' another species?

Seriously?

Is that what you think?

Do you understand that evolution is [i]a web of common ancestry,[/i] that one species does not 'turn into' another species, and that no species is superior to, or inferior to, any other species?