Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Pentagon relabels U.S. casualties caused by Iran amid scrutiny of wartime transparency

BLUF: “Veterans caution that the Trump administration’s move could affect troops’ ability to get care long after the conflict ends.”

The Washington Post reports:

By Tara Copp

The Pentagon has reclassified service members who were killed and wounded during renewed hostilities with Iran in a way that separates them from other troops who have died or been injured as a result of the conflict, a move that critics say obscures the human cost of the Trump administration’s war and could have long-term implications for survivors.

Last week, the Pentagon removed four recent troop deaths — three from an Iranian ballistic missile strike that hit a base in Jordan on July 17, and one who was killed the following day during a controlled detonation of an Iranian drone at a base in Iraq — from its online database. Their removal from what the Pentagon calls its Defense Casualty Analysis System drew immediate congressional scrutiny. At the time, the Pentagon faulted a data-processing error.

The issue occurred as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, were on Capitol Hill pressing lawmakers for billions of dollars in additional wartime funding. During their testimony, Hegseth said the current cost of operations since the Iran conflict began Feb. 28 is more than $37 billion.

On Sunday, the four deaths, and a previously undisclosed number of new wounded personnel, 207, reappeared in the casualty analysis system — but not attached to Operation Epic Fury, the name the Trump administration has assigned to the Iran war. Instead, those casualties were listed under a new category titled “Overseas Contingency Operations.”

The new category appears to encompass only those casualties that have occurred in the weeks since Washington and Tehran declared a ceasefire as the governments pursued a negotiated settlement to the conflict. Those talks broke down this month, and both sides resumed military attacks.

The Trump administration indicated Sunday that the president desires “some space” for diplomatic efforts to continue while he contemplates another military escalation. Officials have rejected reports indicating that the pause is due to the Pentagon’s depleted supply of key defensive weapons.

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to requests for comment on why the troops were first removed from the casualty analysis system and whether it has taken into consideration how reclassifying those casualties could affect survivors and beneficiaries. Last week, the Pentagon’s chief spokesman, Sean Parnell, blamed the removal on a “temporary data disruption.”

To date, the war in Iran has resulted in the deaths of 18 U.S. service members and wounded more than 600, according to the data. The Pentagon has said that many of those who have been wounded have since returned to duty.

Moving the recent casualties into a new category in the Pentagon’s database is not merely a public transparency issue; it could have long-term effects on veterans and survivors’ ability to receive government benefits, a major veterans advocacy group cautioned.

“The way you are recategorizing folks on the back end has second- and third-order effects” said Jess Finucan, an Air Force veteran and spokeswoman for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America.

A service member’s permanent record is built around the military operations that Defense Department data shows they were a part of. That record affects areas including commendations, medical care and survivors benefits, Finucan said.

The administration needs to be “fully responsible and accountable for the full cost of war,” Finucan said.

President Donald Trump announced the start of Operation Epic Fury on Feb. 28 and then declared it over in May, following the announcement of a ceasefire. But U.S. military operations in the region did not end at that time, with two aircraft carriers patrolling nearby and continued air patrols, limited exchanges of fire and then a full resumption of hostilities July 7.

Since then, Iran has hit several U.S. facilities, resulting in scores of additional wounded personnel and four troops killed.

AI generated summary of 194 comments on this article:

The comments express strong disapproval of the Trump administration's handling of military casualties, particularly the reclassification of deaths and injuries from conflicts with Iran.

Many commenters accuse the administration of manipulating casualty data for political gain, comparing it to previous actions to downplay negative statistics. There is a call for accountability and criticism of the perceived lack of respect for military personnel, with some urging voters to oppose Trump and his allies in upcoming elections.
Top | New | Old
Picklebobble2 · 61-69, M Best Comment
Trump's stance changes by the day.

At the beginning of 'Trump 1' he was saying effectively 'Everyone who serves is a hero" and now it seems 'Everyone who serves and then gets injured is a drain on benefits and should probably be denied them...on economic grounds'.

Can't have it both ways Mr President.
However expedient it might be
@Picklebobble2 Excellent point!

Just yesterday a story came out about the services are delaying cleaning up and removing hazardous forever chemicals from bases and especially BASE HOUSING.
Picklebobble2 · 61-69, M
@KunsanVeteran Which (theoretically) discourages serving personnel from either marrying or from being married and having children to recognise and support at the same time.

I mean. Can you imagine the uproar of personnel and their families living in what the government know to be sub-standard housing causing illness to the children that can be proven ?

Every Senator and Representative in a state with a base in would make the governments life hell....said me looking at the mid-terms

MoveAlong · 70-79, M
As if morale in the military wasn't already at an all time low. Soon the armed forces will have to reimplement the draft. No one in their right mind would join the military right now.
PeachNbelle · 18-21, FNew
@KunsanVeteran in a few yeara when all the media hysteria stops are you going to admit you over reacted to the propaganda ir are you still going to buy in
@PeachNbelle LOL—another troll! Troll away, it’s your right.
PeachNbelle · 18-21, FNew
@KunsanVeteran no i think it's a valid point but I'm jo surprised you deflected
justanothername · 56-60, M
This is where US casualties get sent from the Iran war. https://landstuhl.tricare.mil/ It was posted on social media earlier on the year. I think the true number is closer to 1000 casualties by now.
justanothername · 56-60, M
@OhPuhleeze I follow a number of source on social media that give more insight into the Iran war that what you will glean from regular news stories.
OhPuhleeze · 70-79, FNew
@justanothername we owe them that...twenty times more for Iraq and a hundred times more for PALESTINE
justanothername · 56-60, M
@OhPuhleeze Very True
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment