Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do you think nuclear proliferation is basically inevitable?

In the current climate, I do. The only thing I can think of getting in the way of it with the way things presently are is if the uranium decays away and leaves too little left. Though since it has a half-life of about 704million years, that doesn't seem likely.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
TexChik · F
Certainly Obama and Clinton tried to pave the way for that . But rogue nations have no business with nuclear weapons . Stop them and you stop proliferation.
Xuan12 · 31-35, M
@TexChik Too bad nobody ever stopped North Korea in the 33 years they've been developing them. Not Reagan, neither Bush, nor Clinton, nor Obama, nor Trump. China didn't do anything about it either.
TexChik · F
@Xuan12 too bad ol billy boy sent them nuclear material for “ reactors “ 🙄. Obama gave billions to the world’s sponsor for terrorism ... only fools and democrats pull those kind of stunts .
Xuan12 · 31-35, M
@TexChik And Reagan.
TexChik · F
@Xuan12 no Nukes
Xuan12 · 31-35, M
@TexChik No, he sold them convential weapons and gave the money to terrorists.