Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Well, that didn't take long

Twitter Inc's new owner Elon Musk on Thursday raised the possibility of the social media platform going bankrupt, capping a chaotic day that included a warning from a U.S. privacy regulator and the exit of the company's trust and safety leader.

The billionaire on his first mass call with employees said that he could not rule out bankruptcy, Bloomberg News reported, two weeks after buying it for $44 billion - a deal that credit experts say has left Twitter's finances in a precarious position.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/twitter-information-security-chief-kissner-decides-leave-2022-11-10/

I thought this guy was supposed to be a brilliant businessman who was going to make Twitter even more relevant, not an inept clown who was going to destroy it. Of course, the Musk fanbois will tie themselves in knots to justify this, same as they did for Musk's clampdowns on free speech.
Elon musk has somehow developed trumps casino touch.
Northwest · M
Musk is personally on the hook for $11B, and he can't get out of it, if Twitter went Chapter 11. The money came through a loan, personally guaranteed by Musk.

The rest of the loan, came from banks/funds, that were guaranteed by people like Larry Ellison, and even P Diddy, as well as a who's who of "conservatism". They are personally on the hook.

I am not big on conspiracy theories, but all these people/institutions, had to be talked into it, somehow, by Musk.

Jason Calacanis was the primary salesman, who convinced the group that charging a subscription fee, is the solution. Funny thing, is the Andreessen Horowitz VC firm, one of the primary investors, founded by Mark Andreessen, the guy who started Nestsacpe, knows exactly how much to charge for something that's offered for free: 0.

Perhaps the goal was to actually shut Twitter down?
Northwest · M
@SW-User There should be a $B tax. At some point, the peasants will be start polishing off their pitchforks.
SW-User
@Northwest I was particularly surprised to see Andreessen Horowitz on board with this ...

And I'm still not convinced Dorsey is doing anything other than some protocol that seems unlikely to ever go anywhere in terms of adoption by all social sites. Any demo site for this protocol is looking like vaporware, considering the idea began as a Twitter project.

And to me it's nutty to see how many times @jack has tweeted or retweeted about #bitcoin but that's another topic ....

***

Moreover, does this Dave Troy's ongoing writings about this Twitter and Bluesky saga strike you as conspiracy theory or not conspiracy theory?

https://similarworlds.com/social/twitter/4510693-What-are-you-thoughts-on-this-writers-take-on-Musk
Northwest · M
@SW-User nothing about this deal makes any business sense. There’s the data angle, but is the twitter data cache worth $44B? I doubt it.

I’ve done due diligence on companies in the past, the kind of stuff coming out now, you uncover on day 1 of your due diligence exercise. Musk had months to fo that. He could have hired a third to do it. Maybe it’s just an ego thing with him.

I never thought there would be a culture mesh between twitter and Musk, and he should have realized it himself.
Here's an amusing headline:

The email Elon Musk just sent to Twitter employees is a masterclass in how not to communicate

This is just a teaser that leads to the article on Fastcompany.com
https://flipboard.com/topic/employment/the-email-elon-musk-just-sent-to-twitter-employees-is-a-masterclass-in-how-not-t/a-9_waROrvSYultMY7WKbVKw%3Aa%3A84289392-897be63117%2Ffastcompany.com
Yes, he jumped in without understanding the lay of that particular landscape.
@SomeMichGuy In "Office Space," Initech brings in two consultants who are there to interview everyone and figure out who can be let go without hurting the company. Musk should have made no changes until he had a complete analysis of the company's structure and operations. But he has a high opinion of his own intelligence and didn't think he needed that. Now he's begging some of the employees he fired to come back because he realized that their work was actually necessary.
Here's TechCrunch unpacking a bit more twitter mess for us:

On Thursday, key Twitter executives including the company’s Head of Trust and Safety Yoel Roth, as well as its Chief Information Security Officer Lea Kissner, Chief Compliance Officer Marianne Fogarty and Chief Privacy Officer Damien Kieran all abruptly departed the company. The FTC noted that they are watching with “deep concern” the ongoing situation at Twitter in light of the consent decree.

The FTC fined Twitter $150 million earlier this year after finding a breach of the settlement related to user data provided for security purposes being used for ad targeting.

Elon Musk’s lawyer, Alex Spiro, sent the following email to twitter employees, apparently clearing up a miscommunication about legal responsibility:

Elon – questions have arisen today regarding the consent decree in effect at the time you took over the company.

We have our first upcoming compliance check with the ftc since taking over and we will handle it.

The only party to the decree is Twitter- not individuals who work at Twitter. It is Twitter itself (not individual employees) who is a party and therefore only Twitter the company could be liable.

I understand that there have been employees at Twitter who do not even work on the ftc matter commenting that they could to to jail if we were not in compliance- that is simply not how this works. It is the company’s obligation. It is the company’a burden. It is the company’s liability.

We spoke to the FTC today about our continuing obligations and have a constructive ongoing dialogue.

TechCrunch followed up with a bit more clarification:

The 2011 consent decree required Twitter to establish and maintain a program to ensure and regularly report that its new features do not further misrepresent “the extent to which it maintains and protects the security, privacy, confidentiality, or integrity of any nonpublic consumer information.”

In a note (first reported by The Verge) posted in Twitter’s internal slack and visible to all employees, a departing internal attorney said that in fact, individual engineers do engender “personal, professional and legal risk,” seemingly in contradiction to what Spiro sent in the above email.

Source for all excerpts:
https://techcrunch.com/2022/11/11/musks-lawyer-tells-twitter-staff-they-wont-be-liable-if-company-violates-ftc-consent-decree/
Maybe the real money is what Trump paid Elon to bankrupt Twitter.
@Pitchblue LOL as if Trump has ever paid anyone.
SW-User
probably should have gone on a trip to outer space instead 👨‍🚀
@SW-User Which is why he's called "Space Karen."
Tastyfrzz · 61-69, M
AND ALL THE KING'S HORSES AND ALL THE KING'S MEN...
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
Classic overreach aka pride comes before a fall.
@Fukfacewillie Exactly.

 
Post Comment