Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Pure Land Buddhism

This thread will be a series of excerpts from the many books now published on Pure Land Buddhism.

This from "The Shin Buddhist Classical Tradition". The words refer to the recitation of the Nembutsu ( i.e. Namu-Amida-Butsu). In my own life, over about 20 years, the words have slowly morphed into "Thank You" and those words themselves into an instinctive gratitude towards all experience as it unfolds in each moment of time.

Shinran (Japan, 13th century) was one of the "fathers" of Pure Land Buddhism. Shin Buddhism is simply another name used.

[i]Shinran declared that the nembutsu was neither a practice nor a good deed. He rejected the meritorious character of nembutsu recitation. It was not a monastic-meditation practice such as monks might use to gain enlightenment, nor was it a good deed which lay people might employ to gain merits for birth in the Pure Land, or worldly benefits such as health, wealth, or spiritual protection. It was not a mantra to dispel disasters or ward off evil as practiced in other sects. While many earlier teachers are recorded as reciting nembutsu as many as 70,000 times a day as a badge of their virtue, there is no record of Shinran’s reciting it in that manner. There is no set time or number for reciting. For him the only reason to recite it is to express gratitude for the deliverance we have already been assured.[/i]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
One of the "founding fathers" of Shin Buddhism, Shinran, in effect turned history upside down. He understood all reality as the expression of the "Vow mind", as the manifestation of "suchness", as everlasting activities of salvation, Upaya. From this viewpoint, the historical Buddha - and his own teachings - become just one expression within time of the "primal will" that all sentient beings come to realize enlightenment/salvation. Pure Land teachings may or may not be deemed to be derived from him (the historical Buddha) - for, to a certain extent, from such a perspective, this becomes irrelevant. I'd like to add that I am not particularly arguing for Shinran's point of view, merely attempting to explain it. Yet reflecting upon it, the perspective of Shinran can be understood as some sort of guard against fundamentalism, in as much as any expression of spirituality can be understood as being within the orbit of the "divine will" that all be "saved"..........or so it seems to me....

This is all in keeping with many Buddhist sutta's/sutra's:-

[i]The Lord speaks with but one voice, but all beings, each according to their kind, gain understanding, each thinking that the Lord speaks their own language. This is a special quality of the Buddha. The Lord speaks with but one voice, but all beings, each according to their own ability, act upon it, and each derives the appropriate benefit. This is a special quality of the Buddha.[/i]

(Vimalakirti Sutra)



[i]Just as the nature of the earth is one
While beings each live separately,
And the earth has no thought of oneness or difference,
So is the truth of all Buddhas.

Just as the ocean is one
With millions of different waves,
Yet the water is no different:
So is the truth of all Buddhas.

Just as the element earth, while one,
Can produce various sprouts,
Yet it's not that the earth is diverse:
So is the truth of all Buddhas.[/i]

(Hua-Yen Sutra)



[i]I bring fullness and satisfaction to the world,
like rain that spreads its moisture everywhere.
Eminent and lowly, superior and inferior,
observers of precepts, violators of precepts,
those fully endowed with proper demeanor,
those not fully endowed,
those of correct views, of erroneous views,
of keen capacity, of dull capacity -
I cause the Dharma rain to rain on all equally,
never lax or neglectful.
When all the various living beings
hear my Law,
they receive it according to their power,
dwelling in their different environments.....
....The Law of the Buddhas
is constantly of a single flavour,
causing the many worlds
to attain full satisfaction everywhere;
by practicing gradually and stage by stage,
all beings can gain the fruits of the way.[/i]

(The Lotus Sutra, Parable of the Dharma Rain)


Certainly, as I see it, to posit the idea that the Divine - however conceived - has "written" just one book as a prime means of communication, with just one intended meaning, is ultimately incoherent and indefensible.

I will continue to believe (and even continue to observe) that, for those who have the faith that ultimately the Cosmos we live in is benign and means us no harm, for such, the truth of this can be found in all places, at all times.....if we have the eyes to see and the ears to hear.

All this relates - at least for me - with a "beautiful paradox" that I have spoken of before, drawn from the words of Thomas Merton. It comes from a letter written to E.D.Andrews, an expert on the life and beliefs of the Shakers (or the United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing). Andrews had sent Merton a copy of his book, Shaker Furniture, and Merton was responding to the gift. Merton wrote:-

[i]This wordless simplicity, in which the works of quiet and holy people speak humbly for themselves. How important that is in our day, when we are flooded with a tidal wave of meaningless words: and worse still when in the void of those words the sinister power of hatred and destruction is at work. The Shakers remain as witnesses to the fact that only humility keeps man in communion with truth, and first of all with his own inner truth. [b]This one must know without knowing it, as they did. For as soon as a man becomes aware of "his truth" he lets go of it and embraces an illusion.[/i][/b]