The universe is systematic and not random

@Northwest gravity is constant throughout the universe. that is systematic and not random. it does not change.

@Axeroberts Your really don't understand science. The Gravitational constant has been erratic to prove and measurements over a period of time, produce different results. Same with the speed of light, in different mediums.

@Northwest it's a constant as you said. One of many. Again it's systematic. It's very simple

@Axeroberts You really should read replies.

@Northwest if you are alluding that gravity is different in different parts of the universe that's completely incorrect. But there are so many examples. the speed of light for example. Constant.

@Axeroberts You continue to demonstrate your superficial understanding of physics.

I am not alluding, I am giving you facts: The Gravitational constant has been erratic to prove and measurements over a period of time, produce different results. That is a fact.

The speed of light IN A VACCUM is a constant, but when it travels through a Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC), it travels at about 38 miles per hour.

I recommend you read up on system dynamics, to get a better understanding of how the weather on this planet, or your city, is not systematic. Now, apply that to a universe, that was formed through an initial non-symmetrical explosion.

@Northwest mumbo jumbo my friend. you are avoiding reality. precise and systematic. the cell is a great example. nothing random. you are threatened by this

@Axeroberts [quote]mumbo jumbo my friend. you are avoiding reality. precise and systematic. the cell is a great example. nothing random. you are threatened by this[/quote]

So, you don't believe light travels at different speeds, based on the medium it's traveling through?

@Northwest the speed of light is constant in a vacuum. don't made shit up. go troll somewhere else. you are a weak person afraid to change. bye

@Axeroberts
From my comment:


Are you saying that I made this up? Or are you saying that you don't know how to read? Or are you saying that you lack the ability to process things?


Interesting conclusion. I recommend you read up on the non-symmetrical pr big bang, and system dynamics. The latter may open your mind. You may also want to figure out who needs to change.

@Northwest what is your point. this is exactly as i said. systematic. yes or no?

@Axeroberts I wish I gave enough time to explain physics to you

@Northwest systematic? yes or no?

@Axeroberts You really have no clue do you.

@Northwest genes have markers to mark when it begins and ends. that is another example of being systematic. not always physics. It's everywhere.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_constant

@Axeroberts 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

@Northwest 🙄