is biology all that matters?

@ninalanyon No offence, but archaeologist will use this measurement to determine the sex of the person.

@Zenbra Yes, we all know that. So what?

@ninalanyon Don't take it personal. I was just pointing out that there is no way of telling if a male was anything but male when examined biologically. That's all.

@Zenbra We all get that, but no one ever disputed it either.

@ninalanyon well good. I only asked a question. What part of the question implies that I imply anything. My question is based on factual information. Just because I brought it up as a question doesn't mean that there is a point to the question. It seems you are offended because it highlights that the is a difference between in men and women that you would prefer everyone to ignore?

@Zenbra Well the short answer to the question is quite straightforward: No.
But you illustrated the question with a topical reference to transgenderism in a way that suggests that you have a particular opinion on the subject; i was simply asking that you make it explicit.

@ninalanyon if you are asking me if a man can be a woman, then ask it. Instead of implying something that I never asked or said. What I did imply is that a dead body or bones tell the examiner or the archaeologist how to tell if the body was born a physical male or female. It tell us nothing about the behavior or gender of the person. How can that offend you or anyone?? isn't that what this site is about? Asking questions?

@Zenbra Of course I'm not asking if a man can be a woman. Everyone knows, or can easily find out, that the skeletons are distinct and that no interventions will change that. Who's offended?

@ninalanyon you sounded like you were offended or peeped off. understandable, but I never ask questions without some relevance to factual data. And that's all it was , a question