Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Nature, governed by chance creates life:

A life cycle is observed to wax and then wane. It exhibits order and then disorder. It spikes.

A test is possible here. A coin has two sides representing order and disorder. When we flip it umpteen times we observe progressively bigger sets of consecutive heads and tails. These sets of spikes can only mean that as a semblance of nature is neared there is complexity sufficient for the chance creation of life. There's no need for us to pretend there's a magic alien wielding wishing power.

I decided to not include the diagrams. I also choose to not include eight testable evidences proving that nature, governed by chance guarantees afterlife.

💛
Top | New | Old
Renkon · 41-45, M
Every coin flip looks random only because we lack the data and computing power to trace its exact physics...track spin, air, force precisely enough, and the outcome is fixed.

The same logic haunts cosmology. Push back toward the Big Bang, and known physical laws start to break down; we simply don't have equations that hold at that edge. So we can't yet say whether the universe's origin was "designed" or accidental....our physics runs out too soon to tell.

Answering that question may require concepts that lie beyond space, time, and 'non-physical' nature altogether.
Afterlife · 70-79, MNew
@Renkon I only suggested coin flips because people have coins. The test validity has been confirmed on a supercomputer using 0s and 1s.
Renkon · 41-45, M
@Afterlife I understand.

I meant that if we have the right technology, we don’t need many coin flips to determine the probability because we can accurately predict each outcome. However, our current supercomputers don’t have the necessary computational power, so what you said is correct in current world.
Afterlife · 70-79, MNew
@Renkon We're dealing in exponential increments of time here, so it's enough to establish the first four or five sets of spikes. I've also not yet discussed a hidden dynamic of chance that clears up the picture substantially.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Afterlife · 70-79, MNew
@CurrentName What you read only refers to the probability for a next toss. You didn't understand the test. It accurately detects an anomaly that has been shown to exist through supercomputer simulations using 0 and 1. Clearly there are strings of luck. Everyone knows this.

 
Post Comment