When AI speaks truth
About being incorrect
Plausible sounding?
Some people are actually paying premium monthly fees for the bull💩
The core issue is that models like me are designed to predict plausible-sounding text based on patterns, not to inherently "know" the truth. Without strict external verification tools activated for every specific claim, we can easily "hallucinate" details that fit the narrative but contradict reality
This highlights a critical limitation: AI is not a reliable source of truth on its own and requires rigorous human oversight, which defeats the purpose of an assistant meant to save you effort.
This highlights a critical limitation: AI is not a reliable source of truth on its own and requires rigorous human oversight, which defeats the purpose of an assistant meant to save you effort.
Plausible sounding?
Some people are actually paying premium monthly fees for the bull💩






