This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
While no AI will be able to do anyone's job the way they do it, it's more likely that AI will figure out a way to do the same job differently.
There's already a AI algorithm that has figured out how to make quantum chips better, than any human quantum engineers.
Problem is they don't understand how the AI did it, so it's unusable. 🤣
You must understand how something is done, before you can use it in a practical way.
This bottleneck is more a human understanding the problem, than the AI understanding the problem.
It requires a totally different way of human thinking.
Human kind is totally inefficient in its own thinking.
Certain jobs may very well be redundant. Yet practicality may override the redundancy, until we humans catch up to AI's.
So there's no yes or no's to this question. Are we willing to change our thinking?
If yes, then yes.
If no, then no.
If you don't care, then the answer is you'll be forced to, by those that will change their thinking.
There's always a third option BTW! Never just two. 🙃
There's already a AI algorithm that has figured out how to make quantum chips better, than any human quantum engineers.
Problem is they don't understand how the AI did it, so it's unusable. 🤣
You must understand how something is done, before you can use it in a practical way.
This bottleneck is more a human understanding the problem, than the AI understanding the problem.
It requires a totally different way of human thinking.
Human kind is totally inefficient in its own thinking.
Certain jobs may very well be redundant. Yet practicality may override the redundancy, until we humans catch up to AI's.
So there's no yes or no's to this question. Are we willing to change our thinking?
If yes, then yes.
If no, then no.
If you don't care, then the answer is you'll be forced to, by those that will change their thinking.
There's always a third option BTW! Never just two. 🙃
fun4us2b · M
@DeWayfarer Well said 😅
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@fun4us2b Thank you for the BC.