Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Elessar · 26-30, M
Nothing; "AI" needs continuous external input in order to produce quality output, if you remove the humans the quality of the generated stuff worsens and worsens. So if they go it'll be only temporary.
Elessar · 26-30, M
@BlueGreen The more it outputs the worse it gets, so no, there isn't really a long timeframe for it to occur. I'll argue we're already at the point where it's declining (reason why many models are trained with <2022 data), and that's with active human input (that however isn't enough to overcome the feedback), if you remove it it'll get even worse and pretty fast too
Umile · 41-45, F
I mean, they might take a chunk of the business.
But, I don't think they can take the place of humans.
But, I don't think they can take the place of humans.
Porn or prostitution. AI can't be a prostitute yet..
BlueGreen · 31-35, M
@HootyTheNightOwl Bots probably.
@BlueGreen That whole market is going to have issues emerging in the West, though.
For a start, we've got to balance these bots in our existing legal framework... and that's going to take time. For now, porn and prostitution are still viable options - even in countries where prostitution is against the law.
For a start, we've got to balance these bots in our existing legal framework... and that's going to take time. For now, porn and prostitution are still viable options - even in countries where prostitution is against the law.
ThreeLittleBirds · F
Boooty with 3 legs and a hundred fingers on display
Then probably promote AI body positivity 🤷🏻♀️
Then probably promote AI body positivity 🤷🏻♀️