Why are people so so obsessed with fitness and health when looking for a partner

I can see that for an individual but I don’t think you can speak for all heterosexuals.
There are many people without strong bodies that have strong minds ,though I’m not sure what a strong heathy mind is
@SteelHands

@Willomk1 Yes. Another cosmic irony. Most of durable opinions are the easiest formed whereas iron truths are the most difficult to discover and accept.

Well sorry to upset on iron truth and but as a heterosexual I’m not attracted to people of the same mental and physical level@SteelHands

Also what is an iron truth wouldn’t a mild carbon steel truth be more useful

@Willomk1 Steel has carbon, depending on the amount it's in varieties of grade. That's what makes steel from iron. It's more machinable and lower mass.

Harder substances exist in the catalog of alloys. For example monel or the 2 main kinds of cobalt steel alloys.

The term: "Iron truth" has been around since bronze truth age ended. Yet why the metaphor remains merely as iron might be because titanium and other elements are now likely to be discovered.

How can you have an iron truth for something so subjective as to what other people find attractive,
It can be for you as an individual but not for everyone.
@SteelHands

@Willomk1 Because genomes are far better predictors of mate selection than the brain's posterior lateral occular cortex, hypothalmus and prefrontal cortex combined.

And they do a good job of it when they aren't tampered with by widespread societal use of potent artificial substances.

Now, I understood you the first time. You think that humans are so brilliant that nature and nature's god would leave that fundamentally important role to chance survivability.

Mostly everybody would agree with you, too. Because that's the story that has the most profits in it. To think otherwise is counter to the ways and means of almost everything being deconstructed in the west.

You can fault me or call me whatever sort of terms you want. It's not going to change reality.

Your argument is using genetics to predict attractions is fundamental floored in that clearly people don’t just base there attractions on genetics but interactions with others in their environment as well .nurture plays a role as well as nature and that is much harder to map out or even predict. To many variables

So you can like slimmer fitter ladies and I can like fatter less fit ladies and reality remains unchanged

@Willomk1 To both of you. That's not what I said but add that 1, settling for leftovers, 2 limited selection pools, 3 weak or deformed specimens are at the natural low end of these gene selectivity forces and often enough the results prove the rule.

A wealthy guy marries against it by virtue of his economic privilege. Their union produces deformed, less than virile, unfertile daughters, psychologically inferior offspring, etc. You haven't seen it?

Okay. It doesn't exist and I'm wrong then...right. Inbreds and rando results create excellent pairings. Hures bear bishops and millionaire kids are well adjusted and super in demand. 2+2 might not make 4, and men can poop babies.

Whatever.

Everything's great. The kids of the rich are most choiciest, reeeeashthey ishhh. Lol

You miss the point again both genetic and environmental factors have a role you cannot rule out either in this argument I’m not saying genetics aren’t important but it’s not the only factor. Your points are valid but only looking at part of the picture. I think it’s a communication problem rather than scientific @SteelHands

@Willomk1 Absolutely. Nothing with the human propagation is ever cut and dry. Geniuses do not give birth to geniuses and stupid fluks rarely are unable to conceive its just the opposite oftener than not. Sometimes men only stand at attention for one female per day while usually they toss their jizz at and in every gash and seething disease pit that is willing to do a yakof smirnof, including stubbled coxswallows. Nature always finds a way was scratched down in the cave walls what like 140k years ago?

As for communication differences I don't suffer from a lack of assuming the yibbons ribbons givens. Fuck. Bampo dumbo got a Nobel prize and anyone with more than 3 brain cells knows only morons actually become a bit smart here while the truly stupid recognize each others crowè ņe laurel.

So what? Less emphasis on the speed of censorship and more light on the pedestrian isn't any way to roll. Turn down for what isn't a purple cow mcgillicuddy. I friggin invented the bish. Along with 23 maybe 24 I don't know.

Just so you know people used to hear my refrys.