Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Think Self-superior Atheists Are Annoying

(Atheist myself but I don't like the term because it make me feel associated with the bad apples)

I think people who impulsively need to harass people and "own" a debate about religion, how we came to be, how planets were made, etc. with every believers they meet have a disorder or mental illness.

"Hey let's have a meeting we just talk about how christians are retarded for believing in the invisible man in the sky"
"Let's tweet about every joke we make"
"And laugh of every christians we see"
"And tweet about them too!"

Stop it, you're not an intellectual or clever, you're just annoying as hell, you're an immature bully and a jerkbutt and if you think you are converting anyone to your side, you're just pissing them off. Don't talk about science and bring up your "facts", it doesn't matter, you're still awful.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
Newjan, you're objecting to things I didn't say. A Doubter is not the only class of atheist, and a Dreamer doesn't represent all religion.

Also, I'm neither gnostic nor agnostic. This is wrong.

As to the belief proof either way is impossible- this has been thoroughly falsified. I won't lecture on the topic here, as my intention is not to derail the post. Yet look to various onus systems. The Doubter will adopt an incomplete system aka burden of proof; rigging the result. The Dreamer will (informally) adopt a slightly more complete system using unreliable proof types; also rigging the result. Discover the tempered system.