Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Am An Atheist

I once wrote a post on the EP back in my edgy atheist days. While I say I remember it more as a joke than anything else, I did have quite a few valid points, including my analysis of intelligent religious people. My argument was that those who are intelligent, will question their beliefs whether they choose to hold onto them or not.

Challenging your own beliefs is necessary part of critical thinking, and if you are incapable of doing so than you are simply incapable of critical thinking. This would be how to objectively identify a stupid religious person. Well the theists of EP didn't take very kindly to this, called me arrogant, which I admitted to more to parody their sheer irrationality. I was 17 at the time and tempted to making a second post remarking at the fact that some theists apparently can't read comprehensively.

Because it just seemed to me like the only people who could be offended by that post, were those among the religious who never doubted them for a second, not even bothered to ponder at the possibility that they may be wrong, and in their stupidity, they projected their own meaningless arrogance onto me.

But there were so many who got offended I just felt like I was too successful in my analysis of them. The truly intelligent among the religious, never would have taken that kind of offence. It was kind of strange having arguments with those imbeciles at the time. I had never actually seen so many in one place before.

And of course it was boring as well, because none of them were able to discern a thought of their own from what everyone else was saying. It was like looking at this enormous hive mind, and while I did laugh at their pathetic online vitriol, I also realised how people like this would have been dangerous in the past.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
There's a big mistake in your way of thinking that's entirely consistent with being a lifetime skeptic or doubter. A time should come when reasoning is rested, else it has all been for nothing. Those of correct belief will realize this- as will those of incorrect belief.
GeniUs · 56-60, M
My belief is now correct, the likelihood of there being a god, is extremely remote, the likelihood of their being gods is somewhat less so but still extremely unlikely.
SW-User
@GeniUs: I disagree with your analysis. Sort of settling the question of whether or not there is a god(s) is only one tenth the work requirement for arriving at a correct belief. It is true that god(s) don't exist, but this doesn't begin to address whether or not eternal life is possible.
GeniUs · 56-60, M
I don't want to get on the wrong side of you on this but even Richard Dawkins won't say for sure that 'god doesn't exist' (given that he can't prove it).
Eternal life is it possible? Again unprovable so I wouldn't discount it but I would definitely say we are only talking about our consciousness' surviving. Do you believe that eternal life is possible?
SW-User
@GeniUs: If we rely on the scientific method the results are inconclusive for both questions. If we adopt instead a more stringent system the results are conclusive. Within this more demanding system God certainly does not exist and continuation past death certainly does exist. The scientific method should be considered only one half of a proper onus system for proving: founded on bias and geared to producing rigged results the skeptic finds appealing.
GeniUs · 56-60, M
Are you going to share how we prove these things or keep it a mystery?