Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Science and Evidence

Skeptics constantly throw the word evidence at believers as if it has some spectacular meaning. Is that too difficult for you to understand? Does not compute?

First of all when you give a dictionary definition of the word evidence to a skeptic it is evidence for the word evidence, but a skeptic will say it doesn't mean much. [b]Definition of evidence[/b]: "The available body of facts or information indicating [b]whether a belief[/b] or proposition is true or valid." Two important points: first the evidence is used to determine if true or not, and second it includes whether or not a belief as well as proposition is true or valid. Truth is defined as a fact or belief that is accepted as true.

Either way you look at it believers have more evidence and truth than science because they believe it more and it is accepted more. It's almost completely meaningless. Saying science has the evidence is like saying you believe current science to be a valid belief. These facts may change but we are told by science to believe them. For now. We evolved. There was no flood. We are not religious because we don't believe there are any gods. We believe there are no gods. We have no way of knowing what a god is.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DocSavage · M
[quote] Either way you look at it believers have more evidence and truth than science because they believe it more and it is accepted more[/quote]
That is the most ridiculous thing you’ve said yet. You sound like the flat earth crew. They claim not only that the earth is flat, but there is a multi governmental conspiracy, to hide a massive area of land . And that NASA is using all the money it gets for space exploration to pay out massive bribes, to anyone who actually travel far enough to see the edge of the world. They can’t explore space, because there isn’t any.
Such willful stupidity is incomprehensible to most people. Some believe it for biblical reasons. But there are there are many who claim the belief is scientifically valid.
From what you’ve been posting, you seem to believe their faith is enough to make it all plausible.
You also give Atheists, more credibility, in the claim that ignorance on a large scale, can substitute faith for fact.