Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Let's pretend anyone takes this shit literally. The numbers are off. Noah only needed the mammals and the birds so it will be closer to 30k animals total. Also they were afloat for 150 days, not a year. Also God apparently blessed them to keep resources abundant for that time.

Still farfetched but not as farfetched as the post implies.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Qwerty14 The point is that the whole Noah story is one of Divine deliverance. Yes Noah built a boat according to God's design and God used Noah and his boat to keep living things alive. However the problem atheists have is that since they deny the existence of God they rely on the natural which doesn't make sense. The whole point of the story is not to explain how Noah saved the animals but rather how God kept His creation on earth alive. If you deny God the Noah story is nonsense. That is the point of the story - to evidence God. Atheists are stupid.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Emosaur You can not use your supposition as your evidence. You don't understand science or theology.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Emosaur you used the supposition that there is no God as evidence that there is no God. You just aren't smart enough to know it.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Emosaur Yes you did and you are too stupid to know it. As I said before. Atheists are stupid.
@Emosaur "Logically cannot exist". Yeah I disagree. I'd argue a logical person would say there is no conclusive evidence that a God does or does not exist.

Further I'd argue that God doesn't need to exist for the Judeo-Christian religion to have merit. Even if they were all just men writing a fairytale the lessons are all still there. The books have meaning even without God.
@hippyjoe1955 Yes I'm well aware of the point of Noah's Ark. I didn't make any comment about the point of the story. Just that the numbers were off.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Qwerty14 My point is simply that atheists deny the existence of God then use that assertion as proof that there is no God. Circular logic has no place in informed debate. Miracles can't happen therefore there are no miracles is not proof of anything beyond the proponents stupidity.
@hippyjoe1955 I think the biggest stupidity is people using "atheist" as a term for someone void of religion. Tons of religious people are atheists. All atheists believe is there isn't the existence of God(s).
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Qwerty14 Atheism is a religion.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Emosaur Who is the one trying to vaunt his religion with constant posts about being an atheist? I have issues? You are insane.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Emosaur No you have no clue what you are talking about. You try to use your supposition as evidence. What a maroon.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@Emosaur Those who don't believe in the Judeo-Christian/Islamic (gnostic) faiths are agnostic. Atheists don't believe in a god(s) of any kind.
@hippyjoe1955 Atheism is an aspect of religion but it isn't a religion in and of itself.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@Emosaur Yeah you're taking the more modern, literal interpretation of the word agnostic. Gnosticism is the beliefs of the Judeo-Christians. Agnosticism was a term created to be the opposite. Those who don't believe in YHWH.

But because the word gnosis means knowledge, the more modern terms for those who know and don't know came to be.